Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*62\s+948\s+slave\s+on\s+69\s+1275\s+tranny\s+\=\s+Good\s+Idea\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*62\s+948\s+slave\s+on\s+69\s+1275\s+tranny\s+\=\s+Good\s+Idea\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. 62 948 slave on 69 1275 tranny = Good Idea? (score: 1): Author: Jay Quinn <jpquinn@cyberramp.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 17:39:20 -0500; I know that the 62 948 clutch slave is a smaller bore diamater than the original 69 Sprite and 72 Midget 1275 larger bore clutch slave. Is it OK or a good idea to use a rebuilt 62 948 small bore clut; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg00103.html (7,458 bytes)
2. Re: 62 948 slave on 69 1275 tranny = Good Idea? (score: 1): Author: "U. Goettsch" <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 19:13:52 -0700 (PDT); installing a slave cylinder with a smaller bore will make the clutch move faster and heavier. Less pedal movement is required, but the pedal is harder to push. In the course of my 5-speed conversion; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg00115.html (8,508 bytes)
3. Re: 62 948 slave on 69 1275 tranny = Good Idea? (score: 1): Author: EMILY COWEN <ecowen@cln.etc.bc.ca>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 01:25:17 -0700 (PDT); Hi Q!! Nope, it's not. The 948 used a SMALLER, LIGHTER SPRING PRESSURE clutch pressure plate than the 1275. You need the mechanical advantage of the larger bore to overcome the increased spring resis; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg00122.html (7,789 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]