- 41. Re: MG trailer (score: 1)
- Author: Emjaxfl@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 20:38:53 EDT
- The stat that I took was brand new but it could be defective. It was installed TOP up. Eric in Florida
- /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00043.html (6,365 bytes)
- 42. ELC Canister (score: 1)
- Author: Emjaxfl@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:53:13 EDT
- Greetings to All: I have obtained a used but functional ELC canister for my 74 MGB. My goal is to get rid of the occasional fuel vapor smell. The mounting brackets and clamp did not come with the can
- /html/mgs/2006-10/msg00114.html (6,980 bytes)
- 43. Re: MGC (score: 1)
- Author: Emjaxfl@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:25:42 EST
- An MGC is potentially a excellent car. All cars are built to a compromise and the C suffered more than most. Shoestring budgets and the Leyland merger killed the C first and the B second. Proper tir
- /html/mgs/2006-11/msg00081.html (7,632 bytes)
- 44. Re: Removal of Lower Lever Arm-66 B (score: 1)
- Author: Emjaxfl@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:01:04 EST
- I seem to recall that placing a jack under the damper link and putting wright on the jack would prevent the threaded portion from spinning and the nut would unthread. Let us know what works. Eric in
- /html/mgs/2007-01/msg00085.html (6,925 bytes)
- 45. Re: [Mgs] Bumper Guard Conundrum (score: 1)
- Author: Emjaxfl@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:19:51 EDT
- Greetings to All, I recall reading that one would need to use the front bumper guards on the rear bumper to do this conversion. Also, the rear bumper bar on a '74 is unique and one might need to chan
- /html/mgs/2007-08/msg00394.html (7,112 bytes)
- 46. [Mgs] Bumper Conversion (score: 1)
- Author: Emjaxfl@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:01:47 EDT
- Greetings to All, I recall reading that one would need to use the front bumper guards on the rear bumper to do this conversion. Also, the rear bumper bar on a '74 is unique and one might need to chan
- /html/mgs/2007-08/msg00422.html (7,037 bytes)
- 47. [Mgs] Bumper Conversion (score: 1)
- Author: Emjaxfl@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:46:57 EDT
- After digging through my memory a little more, I remembered the reason for using front guards on the rear bumper was that (most of) the rear guards had the plate lights built into them. To some exten
- /html/mgs/2007-08/msg00431.html (7,133 bytes)
- 48. Re: [Mgs] vibration (score: 1)
- Author: Emjaxfl@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 23:26:23 EDT
- Look at your u-joints and wheel bearings? Eric _______________________________________________ Edit your replies Mgs@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs
- /html/mgs/2007-10/msg00061.html (6,593 bytes)
- 49. Re: [Mgs] MGB engine (score: 1)
- Author: Emjaxfl@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:11:08 EDT
- IIRC, there were two versions of the O series engine, one with FI and one with carburetors. Either would have passed US regulations without catalytic converters but, as Paul stated, BL politics preve
- /html/mgs/2007-10/msg00092.html (7,441 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu