- 1. Swirl Pot (score: 1)
- Author: DickShaler@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 10:49:37 EDT
- Thanks for the discussion on the swirl pot issue. After a few false starts I have arrived at the same general conclusion and have been trying to find someone who might construct such a vessel that w
- /html/mgb-v8/1998-07/msg00005.html (7,028 bytes)
- 2. Re: Swirl Pot (score: 1)
- Author: Keith Wheeler <keithw@sand.net>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 09:58:26 -0700
- How many of us need a swirl pot solution right now? I've got two fuel injected 'B V-8 projects that need them. Maybe we could all get together and do a "bulk" order. Anyone else interested? Keep us i
- /html/mgb-v8/1998-07/msg00007.html (7,788 bytes)
- 3. Re: Swirl Pot (score: 1)
- Author: "Christopher G. Moog" <cgmoog@ibm.net>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 19:02:33 -0400
- I'm not that far along, but may be interested if the design is good and the price is fair.
- /html/mgb-v8/1998-07/msg00009.html (7,376 bytes)
- 4. Re: Swirl Pot (score: 1)
- Author: DickShaler@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 23:20:12 EDT
- Yes, the 95,96 engines have the new block casting, front covers, etc. The '95 is a 3.9 designation with the multiport injection and the '96 4.0 is a sequential injection GEMS system. Same block cast
- /html/mgb-v8/1998-07/msg00014.html (7,655 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu