- 1. [Fwd: Time goes bye bye !]non-lbc (score: 1)
- Author: Bud Krueger <budkrueger@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:30:47 -0500
- non lbc, but fascinating. And, it'll be here in 32 minutes! Bud Krueger Return-Path: <BarnOwl@world.std.com> Received: from TheWorld.com ([199.172.62.105]) by emu (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP i
- /html/mg-t/2002-02/msg00061.html (8,772 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Fwd: Time goes bye bye !]non-lbc (score: 1)
- Author: Charles Hill <candahill@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:09:47 -0600
- You don't expect the world to last unti 21:12, 21/12, 2112? Regards, Charles Hill /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /
- /html/mg-t/2002-02/msg00064.html (7,924 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Fwd: Time goes bye bye !]non-lbc (score: 1)
- Author: Rocky Frisco <rock@rocky-frisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 01:47:47 -0600
- I'm fairly sure the other more than half of the world that doesn't use our calendar couldn't care less. ;) (What is this, the Year of the Fruitbat?) -Rock http://www.rocky-frisco.com -- Red Dirt Rang
- /html/mg-t/2002-02/msg00065.html (7,951 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Fwd: Time goes bye bye !]non-lbc (score: 1)
- Author: MGTD1952@cs.com
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 05:58:22 EST
- << Well Charles, your notation is not the original US style I assume, so according to the older US notation type Bud's idea would be like 21:12, 12/21, 2112 which does not fit. But it is one of the v
- /html/mg-t/2002-02/msg00066.html (7,358 bytes)
- 5. RE: [Fwd: Time goes bye bye !]non-lbc (score: 1)
- Author: "Garth Green" <headlam@kingsley.co.za>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:06:33 +0200
- And did you spot the occasion when time/date read 12345678? This was at 12:34 on 5 June '78 Garth Green ......As the clock ticks over from 8:01PM on Wednesday, February 20th, 2002, /// unsubscribe/ch
- /html/mg-t/2002-02/msg00070.html (7,649 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu