- 1. uphill/downhill (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 05:20:36 -0700
- It has seemed to me that most every car i have worked on went slower in the morning return run than they qualified ** ** Dave's statement is true to a large extent. This is why we say that in the mor
- /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00771.html (7,350 bytes)
- 2. Re: uphill/downhill (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:59:45 -0400
- sure makes me a fan of same day return runs... Gotta love the return run down hill with a tail wind ! What if the return runs were scheduled at 5:00 pm or so depending on how many cars and then just
- /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00776.html (7,841 bytes)
- 3. Re: uphill/downhill (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 06:58:38 -0700
- According to my recollections, when we ran the two way averages in the early morning, the speeds were generally higher than the qualifying speeds. I remember one in particular...Bob Jonecke's (sp) D
- /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00778.html (8,117 bytes)
- 4. uphill/downhill (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:51:43 -0700
- I think you're correct. Now that I thought about it some I remember when starting people from the 9 mile that they were now running downhill because the morning speeds were consistently faster. Old
- /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00784.html (7,009 bytes)
- 5. Re: uphill/downhill (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Van Scoy" <edvs@uswest.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:43:53 -0700
- I'll definalely vote for that............. /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing in it but /// /// u
- /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00788.html (8,088 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu