Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*land\-speed\-digest\s+V1\s+\#2399\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*land\-speed\-digest\s+V1\s+\#2399\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: land-speed-digest V1 #2399 (score: 1): Author: "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 18:05:35 -0800; I think it's about safety. And that's GREAT! I don't think the board could go any other way. With traction control (in theory, at least) we reduce the amount of driver skill needed. But there are ple; /html/land-speed/2006-12/msg00084.html (7,484 bytes)
2. Re: land-speed-digest V1 #2399 (score: 1): Author: "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:06:38 -0800; Mayf--I share your concerns about the technical feasibility of TC on the Salt. Progress is not without some risk. In this situation I think it's manageable. The real control valve here is not the rul; /html/land-speed/2006-12/msg00085.html (7,822 bytes)
3. Re: land-speed-digest V1 #2399 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:51:59 -0800; MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL... I am not in the leasat troubled by allowing traction control. I am a firm believer that the best traction control is under your right foot! Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/FCC; /html/land-speed/2006-12/msg00087.html (6,671 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]