- 1. chassis specs? (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Bland" <paul.blandavon@btinternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:03:03 +0100
- Hi all, just taking a brief break from lurking in the background, who do I contact re: wall thickness etc.... for a chassis/cage (Dan Warner?), don't want any hassles at "Tech"! Anyone got an email a
- /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00561.html (7,117 bytes)
- 2. Re: chassis specs? (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Shannon <saltfevr@xmission.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:02:30 -0600
- Quoting Paul Bland <paul.blandavon@btinternet.com>: First thing is to get a 2003 rule book. Pages 22-26 will answer most roll bar and frame questions. Dans addie is dwarner@electrorent.com. Good luck
- /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00562.html (7,509 bytes)
- 3. Re: chassis specs? (score: 1)
- Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:05:35 -0400
- Actual rule book specs are only for the roll cage/bar. Some guys use a .095" frame with a .120" cage welded on. Don't see the big benefit in that. Don't think the extra weight (100 lbs. maybe) will
- /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00581.html (7,773 bytes)
- 4. Re: chassis specs? (score: 1)
- Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 17:43:01 -0700
- Over the years after seeing many accidents I agree with John. Keep the tubing size. Seen too many rip away from the thinner wall tubing. Glen -- Original Message -- From: "John Beckett" <saltracer@s
- /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00582.html (8,411 bytes)
- 5. Re: chassis specs? (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 05:54:36 -0400
- I am the last guy to add weight but a sound frame and cage is not ballast. In my opinion the money that is spent on safety and crash worthy parts is never wasted. If I were to build a car that has a
- /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00590.html (8,720 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu