Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SBC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SBC\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. SBC (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:00:38 -0800 (PST); Nt788@aol.com wrote:... ... I guess them old 302 Cameros were just accidents! I gotta admit . . . . those almost made a chevy man out of me. Heck, I dunno what I'm gripin about, a SBC is what's keepi; /html/land-speed/2002-11/msg00493.html (6,871 bytes)
2. SBC (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:21:32 -0700 (PDT); I've been sitting here making good use of my lunch hour looking at SBD dimensions and have come up with a question. The weakling of all SBCs had to be the 262 that was made during the mid-seventies.; /html/land-speed/2001-08/msg00393.html (6,920 bytes)
3. Re: SBC (score: 1): Author: Ken Bond <kmb2@humboldt.edu>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:46:51 -0700; Dick, In my opinion, NO it is not a good candidate. For small engines ("D" motors), the key seems to be to rev high to make horsepower. Large bore and short strokes are the wisdom of the day to rev h; /html/land-speed/2001-08/msg00403.html (9,008 bytes)
4. Re: SBC (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:52:52 -0700; I think if you want to run the 262 you would think about the 3 inch crank and E class. Rich Fox --Original Message-- From: Ken Bond <kmb2@humboldt.edu> To: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; land-speed@auto; /html/land-speed/2001-08/msg00407.html (8,911 bytes)
5. Re: SBC (score: 1): Author: DOUG ODOM <popms@thegrid.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:05:34 -0700; Dick, They are all thin wall castings. Anything over .030 is not going to hold up very well. That only gives you 267 CID. Hard to get any valve size into that small of a bore also. Doug Odom in big d; /html/land-speed/2001-08/msg00427.html (7,126 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]