Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Racer\s+Classifications\s+\(was\s+geezers\.\.\.\)\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Racer Classifications (was geezers...) (score: 1)
Author: "Lawrence E. & Cathy R. Mayfield" <lemay@hiwaay.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 00:53:32
Becoming pretty obvious now. We need classifications of racers, bench racers, lurkers just as we have vehicle classes. Maybe we should put a rule book together with "specs" for the various classifica
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00230.html (8,743 bytes)

2. Re: Racer Classifications (was geezers...) (score: 1)
Author: DOUG ODOM <popms@thegrid.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 14:21:15 -0800
There are really only two classes--Real racers and want to bee's!! You don't have to read very many messages to find who is who. just another doug
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00233.html (9,253 bytes)

3. Re: Racer Classifications (was geezers...) (score: 1)
Author: "Lawrence E. & Cathy R. Mayfield" <lemay@hiwaay.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 05:07:32
Yep, you got it. I am a wannabie! Haven't raced yet, but car is coming along. I think I'll go into lurker mode until I can boast about been there, done that. mayf L.E. Mayfield 124 Maximillion Drive
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00235.html (8,302 bytes)

4. Re: Racer Classifications (was geezers...) (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 17:34:23 -0600
Nope.... Bud.... Your a Racer.... anyone that is building a car to Run out there is a Racer.... sorting it all out Makes you just that.... I was Bragging on you to Doug the other day.... And don't yo
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00236.html (9,108 bytes)

5. Re: Racer Classifications (was geezers...) (score: 1)
Author: V4GR@aol.com
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 19:44:43 EST
List; I want to go on record here "I am not a Geezer" But the kid who drove my roadster to the G/GR record, who had never driven a stick before driving the roadster, says I am. I am glad to see the l
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00239.html (8,040 bytes)

6. Re: Racer Classifications (was geezers...) (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 17:43:47 -0800
Being a wannabie is nothing to be ashamed of. The truth is that all racers were wannabies before they were racers. Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/CC
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00242.html (8,776 bytes)

7. Re: Racer Classifications (was geezers...) (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:23:51 -0600
there,
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00243.html (9,286 bytes)

8. Re: Racer Classifications (was geezers...) (score: 1)
Author: DOUG ODOM <popms@thegrid.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 21:33:38 -0800
Rich, I think geezer is a state of mind. At Bonneville I love it when I hear guys alot older than I am ( 4-12-41 ) talking about what they are going to do for next year. I have people ask me when I'm
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00244.html (8,579 bytes)

9. Re: Racer Classifications (was geezers...) (score: 1)
Author: Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@pro-blend.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 10:17:29 -0800
You are more than a wannabie......how about "willabie"? I agree with Keith. Lurk if you want to but don't get too far away! I appreciate the help that you have so graciously provided along the way.
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00245.html (8,880 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu