Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Nissan\s+on\s+Dyno\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Nissan\s+on\s+Dyno\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Nissan on Dyno (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 10:17:41 -0500; A full race 3.0L set-up probably should make 320 to 360 HP. JB advance baby was 3; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00002.html (7,271 bytes)
2. Re: Nissan on Dyno (score: 1): Author: V4GR@aol.com; Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 12:57:06 EST; John; 360 sounds like a lot for a single cam 2 valve motor. I would like to think that we will get 260 when I get cams, roller rockers, solid lifters (anybody know what the top rpm was for an '84 Nis; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00010.html (6,786 bytes)
3. Nissan on Dyno (score: 1): Author: V4GR@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 23:15:14 EST; Finally made a pull with my 3 liter 84 Nissan V6. With 32 degrees advance and stock cams and hydraulics but 12.5 CR Aries pistons and my homemade baby bug catcher injector it pulled 199.8 hp at 6000; /html/land-speed/1999-12/msg00469.html (6,731 bytes)
4. Re: Nissan on Dyno (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 06:09:29 -0800 (PST); Chryslers, Buicks and Ford SHOs put out around 215 - 225. It would probably take a lot of cubic money to put out much more than that without a turbo or blower. == Dick J in east Texas ECTA #72 FX/GMR; /html/land-speed/1999-12/msg00475.html (7,402 bytes)
5. Re: Nissan on Dyno (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 12:03:55 -0500; The torque # is about 100 off with 190... the hp is pretty disappointing too. a twin cam that is good typically makes 2.4 to 2.6 hp/cu/in if all is right.. 430 to 460 is in the ball park for the hp i; /html/land-speed/1999-12/msg00480.html (7,822 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]