Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hydraulic\s+Roller\s+Cams\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hydraulic\s+Roller\s+Cams\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Hydraulic Roller Cams? (score: 1): Author: "Bill Bennett" <benettw@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 21:22:17 -0500; I have been thinking about running a hydraulic roller cam in my first motor next year for testing in the new car. I am going to be similar to Dick J on this one. Going to try to limit rpms to around; /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00084.html (7,373 bytes)
2. Re: Hydraulic Roller Cams? (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 06:22:40 -0800 (PST); Bill, if you're building the motor from scratch, why only 10:1. I'm using 9.5:1 'cause that's what was in the motor when I got it. It would seem like a little more CR would be a good thing. I'm sure; /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00103.html (8,288 bytes)
3. Re: Hydraulic Roller Cams? (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 14:45:33 -0500; /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00130.html (7,792 bytes)
4. Re: Hydraulic Roller Cams? (score: 1): Author: "Bill Bennett" <benettw@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:27:24 -0500; Yeah Dave but wouldn't I give up engine acceleration by going with a solid lifter. I figured that since I was limiting myself to 6500 rpm on this first motor why not use the hydraulic roller. This wa; /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00136.html (9,073 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]