Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Handling\s+on\s+Salt\s+\-\s+\-\s+Open\s+rear\s+end\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Handling\s+on\s+Salt\s+\-\s+\-\s+Open\s+rear\s+end\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Handling on Salt - - Open rear end (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:06:03 -0700 (PDT); Leads me to question the wisdom of having a spool in our Winter's QC as opposed to a "posi" or "open" rear end. Anyone have thoughts about the different set ups? Don, I had an open in the Camaro and; /html/land-speed/2006-09/msg00164.html (7,135 bytes)
2. Re: Handling on Salt - - Open rear end (score: 1): Author: Doug Odom <dlodom@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:58:55 -0700; Dick, I keep seeing this question asked. The problem is, LSR cars can be anything from a 108"wb, 60" tread width door slammer to a 225"wb, 18" tread width streamliner. Think about how different the e; /html/land-speed/2006-09/msg00165.html (7,769 bytes)
3. Re: Handling on Salt - - Open rear end (score: 1): Author: Jane McMeekin <mcmeekin@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:27:06 -0400; Thanks for the ideas regarding "Handling on the salt." Guess I neglected to identify the car in question- Its a door slammer with a wide track and a short wheelbase that runs in the 235mph range. As; /html/land-speed/2006-09/msg00166.html (7,220 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]