- 1. Gear Ratio Formula (Part 1) (score: 1)
- Author: "3liter" <saltfever@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:41:44 -0800
- Thanks for the thoughtful response. There is no question the circumference of the tire and its revolutions are tied to a finite distance. However, I don't think that is the issue. The engine applies
- /html/land-speed/2004-03/msg00462.html (8,656 bytes)
- 2. Re: Gear Ratio Formula (Part 1) (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:58:16 -0600
- Here's what I know I have a data acq system and a downloading playback Tach that I've used to determine Engine Rpm. When I take that engine rpm and the total height of the tire and multiply them... I
- /html/land-speed/2004-03/msg00464.html (7,499 bytes)
- 3. Gear Ratio Formula (part 1) (score: 1)
- Author: "3liter" <saltfever@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:11:08 -0800
- I went to the Autometer web sight to see if I could find out the accuracy of their tach. Not a mention anywhere. So I pulled out their '04 catalog and scoured it for any mention of accuracy. Nada!! M
- /html/land-speed/2004-03/msg00466.html (8,627 bytes)
- 4. Re: Gear Ratio Formula (part 1) (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:27:42 -0600
- 246.555 mph record.... Yep the Data acq backs that up... no wheel slip in the higher gears... Dave and I played with the Tire altitude to determine what the wheel sensors gave us for MPH.... so I'm n
- /html/land-speed/2004-03/msg00467.html (7,376 bytes)
- 5. RE: Gear Ratio Formula (Part 1) (score: 1)
- Author: "3liter" <saltfever@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:44:00 -0800
- Thank you...Thank you. You and I are both using the same formula...the constant is 168. Others use a constant of 336(which requires a diameter). The discussion generally indicates they are both accu
- /html/land-speed/2004-03/msg00472.html (7,310 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu