Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+Systems\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+Systems\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Fuel Systems (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:47:05 -0400; We have talked often about the perceived advantages of EFI over more conventional fuel systems. And I guess we beat it to death. So here is another more conventional fueling related question. I have; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00390.html (7,583 bytes)
2. Fuel Systems (score: 1): Author: FastmetalBDF@aol.com; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:26:01 EDT; Hilborns have sharper, quicker throttle response ......... which doesn' t seem necessary in land speed racing . BDF /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00392.html (7,212 bytes)
3. Re: Fuel Systems (score: 1): Author: Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@pro-blend.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:34:30 -0500; John, My observation is that you can bolt on as many CFM as you like and the engine will only use what it needs. Interesting calculation there.....try it. Skip /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net maili; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00394.html (7,966 bytes)
4. Re: Fuel Systems (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:02:32 -0400; Well if I do the math my motor doesnt even want 950 cfm (727 cfm to be exact), but it does run better at Bonneville with it over a 750 Holley. And why do they even bother with 2000 to 3000 cfm on a H; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00395.html (8,602 bytes)
5. Re: Fuel Systems (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:48:50 -0700; Since I am a injector user, I feel the need to respond to your question. The last carburetors that I ran were Stromberg "97s" and I don't have a clue as to the cfms. It goes without comment that car; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00396.html (8,564 bytes)
6. Re: Fuel Systems (score: 1): Author: ardunbill@webtv.net; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:37:53 -0400 (EDT); John, fundamentally the Hilborn HAS to be better than any carb. If the carb worked better in a certain application, could it be that some air scoop arrangement was ramming air unequally into the vari; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00405.html (7,489 bytes)
7. Re: Fuel Systems (score: 1): Author: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:37:21 -0700; Could it be the runner length? Jim in Palmdale /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing in it but ///; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00406.html (7,989 bytes)
8. Re: Fuel Systems (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 06:17:55 -0400; What you are missing John is that with an IR setup the cylinder only sees the 1 butterfly for airflow. With the carb it sees all 4 so the airflow is not all that much different for the most part betw; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00418.html (9,371 bytes)
9. Re: Fuel Systems (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:25:53 -0400; OK, this makes some sense to me. Any advantage in connecting the stacks into a common plenum? Or does this have to be below the throttle plate? John -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddah; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00424.html (10,205 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]