Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chute\s+Force\s+$2$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chute\s+Force\s+$2$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Chute Force (2) (score: 1): Author: "3liter" <saltfever@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:34:11 -0700; 01 Jul 2004 john robinson, Subject: chute loads v/s time (snip..)regardless of speed, and the loads seen are mitigated by the stretchyness of the nylon system, now we were gathering data at 40 bits a; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00176.html (7,686 bytes)
2. Re: Chute Force (2) (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 04:39:26 -0700; The problem with LSR chute deployment vs sky divers is that in LSR the tow strap is generally very long and is ejected backwards. The effect of this is that the cute in LSR is at a virtual stand stil; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00178.html (8,813 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]