- 1. Re: Alternative Red Hat methods (score: 1)
- Author: wspotter <wester6935@home.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 16:42:14 -0800
- I'm assuming you're actually spelling that thRUST in this case? Wes /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with no
- /html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00069.html (9,505 bytes)
- 2. Alternative Red Hat methods (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 04:22:06 -0800
- Maybe I should stick to my magnet theory.... which was to put a BIG magnet at the 5 mile marker..... and drag the car to it.... ... ( I dropped this theory when I realized how little Steel was left i
- /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00739.html (7,798 bytes)
- 3. Re: Alternative Red Hat methods (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 06:48:13 -0600
- With the advent of technology in Bungee jumping this could be the ultimate plan... and think.... if Glen was quick we could have a return run on the rebound.... K -- magnet one ) ** * feet Brad /// /
- /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00741.html (8,426 bytes)
- 4. Re: Alternative Red Hat methods (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 07:52:02 -0700
- No can do Dan, everyone knows that the SCTA doesnt sanction "THRUST" powered endeavors, read your rule book!! Now if you created another class, for "classic" dim wits, you might have something Joe :)
- /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00744.html (8,256 bytes)
- 5. Re: Alternative Red Hat methods (score: 1)
- Author: "glen barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 07:25:34 -0800
- magnet this one Glen ) ** * feet Brad I think we should try the big rubber band theory with the motor cycles first. Could be a little hard on the rider though. And as far as Keith, we are fast enough
- /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00747.html (9,298 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu