Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*4\s+or\s+5\s+speed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*4\s+or\s+5\s+speed\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 4 or 5 speed (score: 1): Author: "Dale & Evelyn Thomas" <bikerschoice@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 08:28:04 -0500; This is one where I will probably ramble too much, but here it goes. Since the final drive ratio is the same it does not make that much difference, I would rather have the five speed on a pure stree; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00000.html (8,346 bytes)
2. Re: 4 or 5 speed (score: 1): Author: "JAMES CANNON" <dr.piston@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 09:14:06 -0500; A 5-speed allows better use of your power band and thereby gives you many more usable final drive combinations if your running a big twin that is.; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00054.html (7,090 bytes)
3. 4 or 5 speed (score: 1): Author: DJ <speed@gloenterprises.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 17:12:08 -0500; In planning my motorcycle construction I have the option of using a 4 or 5 speed transmission, I plan on reaching approx 140 mph, is there any advantage over one or the other since both give exactly; /html/land-speed/1999-12/msg00504.html (6,507 bytes)
4. Re: 4 or 5 speed (score: 1): Author: "Tom Neimeyer" <3cbxs@ev1.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 17:30:35 -0600; I would think the 5 speed is best. It will allow you to run a smaller sprocket at rear wheel while allowing the bike to get rolling with minimum effort. It should also reduce the distance (ratio)bet; /html/land-speed/1999-12/msg00505.html (7,021 bytes)
5. Re: 4 or 5 speed (score: 1): Author: ECTA845@aol.com; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 18:43:21 EST; If it was my bike/car it would have a 5 speed with the ratios as close as you can get them. Still frozen in Michigan. Randy Williams ECTA # 845 MONZAMILER RACING; /html/land-speed/1999-12/msg00506.html (6,620 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]