Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1928\-29\s+Ford\s+Roadster\s+bodies\s+in\s+LSR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1928\-29\s+Ford\s+Roadster\s+bodies\s+in\s+LSR\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. RE: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:32:17 -0600; I think it's more in the spirit of "Wrong- Way Corrigan". Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ our doesn't and all open a I'd question whether the ass-end of a 27 T roadster is very aerodynamic compared to the; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00437.html (9,755 bytes)
22. RE: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "James Tone" <James.Tone@AES.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 08:52:49 -0800; Pintoad comes to mind it would not be the first car that was better at going backwards rather than the way originally designed. Dave __________________________________________________________________; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00438.html (9,444 bytes)
23. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:08:32 EST; Neil, You're right. Just place the comma in the correct spot. " Wrong Way, Corrigan". ......Regards, Ardun Doug; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00439.html (8,518 bytes)
24. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:12:12 EST; Tom, Compared to running with the normal cowl forward I'm certain that the ass-end of a roadster would be more aerodynamic. It's compared to the normal streamlining allowed in MR today that I was tal; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00440.html (8,729 bytes)
25. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "The Weldons" <2weldons@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:01:08 -0800; On the subject of running a 27T body backwards as a modified roadster-- I don't think it would be quite as resistant to spins as the conventional layout of a modified roadster. Another thought: Follo; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00442.html (9,042 bytes)
26. RE: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:28:00 -0500; I had always hoped that the LSR venue would allow me to think outside the box as far as possible as the rules while comprehensive are shorter than some other organizations.. At east there are no man; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00443.html (10,160 bytes)
27. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:35:53 -0800; Now that's the kind of R&D that I like too see! Thanks Tom, Bryan; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00444.html (8,237 bytes)
28. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "J D Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:13:28 -0800; I know certain board members read what is said here but do not answer( I don't blame them either). So here goes: I wouldn't be spending 10 to 20K building a car with a backwards body without really m; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00445.html (9,777 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]