- 1. [Land-speed] Turbo cam (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:45:06 -0700
- Here is another theoretical question: Are the camshaft requirements for a turbocharged engine different from a normally aspirated one and how so? Jim in Palmdale _____________________________________
- /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00050.html (6,822 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Land-speed] Turbo cam (score: 1)
- Author: "ddahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:10:12 -0400
- _______________________________________________ Land-speed@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
- /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00051.html (6,740 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Land-speed] Turbo cam (score: 1)
- Author: Dale Krumheuer <dmirror3@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
- Good answer Dave, let me preface my response by saying that I respect your experience and contributions. In response to "A turbo charged engine is an NA one at a different altitude" Looking for an ed
- /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00052.html (9,165 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Land-speed] Turbo cam (score: 1)
- Author: "23weldon" <23.weldon@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:06:37 -0700
- Dave -- The analogy to altitude makes sense as a first order comparison. (uhhh........ looking back here on the agony of undergraduate engineering thermodynamics) Perhaps we're thinking of Death Vall
- /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00053.html (7,927 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu