Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Land\-speed\]\s+Downforce\s+vs\s+Ballast\s+Question\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Land-speed] Downforce vs Ballast Question (score: 1)
Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Which is better? It would seem that if you add, say 500 pounds of ballast, it's a simple addition. If you add a spoiler designed to add 500 pounds of downforce, then you are adding the effective weig
/html/land-speed/2007-06/msg00051.html (7,305 bytes)

2. Re: [Land-speed] Downforce vs Ballast Question (score: 1)
Author: "Rich Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:56:12 -0700
Lift, or negative lift equals drag. Weight has to be accelerated. I think Dave D. had a lot to say about killing lift instead of adding downforce to achieve the desired result. RF -- Original Message
/html/land-speed/2007-06/msg00052.html (7,795 bytes)

3. Re: [Land-speed] Downforce vs Ballast Question (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@wildblue.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:19:42 -0700
Contrary to some myths, LSR, as we do it is a standing start competition. OK, Drag Race -- Standing Start - 4 mile or 2mile or 1.3... Rick in Neb IV -- check his speed in the 2 1/4. It's *_awesome_*
/html/land-speed/2007-06/msg00053.html (7,756 bytes)

4. Re: [Land-speed] Downforce vs Ballast Question (score: 1)
Author: <neil@dbelltech.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:24:23 -0700
Downforce comes at the expense of increased drag, a bad tradeoff in LSR but in the old Can- Am series downforce was necessary to get good handling in the corners. Weight was a penalty, reducing the
/html/land-speed/2007-06/msg00054.html (7,627 bytes)

5. Re: [Land-speed] Downforce vs Ballast Question (score: 1)
Author: Flowbench@aol.com
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:42:27 EDT
Which is better? It would seem that if you add, say 500 pounds of ballast, it's a simple addition. If you add a spoiler designed to add 500 pounds of downforce, then you are adding the effective weig
/html/land-speed/2007-06/msg00055.html (8,042 bytes)

6. Re: [Land-speed] Downforce vs Ballast Question (score: 1)
Author: <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:16:17 -0400
--==0669613040== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It is only my opinion but the way I see it we are still having a drag race though a long one. The bea
/html/land-speed/2007-06/msg00066.html (8,976 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu