- 1. (Tech) sbc overbalance opinion (score: 1)
- Author: ardunbill@webtv.net
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:19:06 -0500 (EST)
- Hi Folks, been reading the messages about V8 and V7 crankshaft balancing with interest. Some of the ideas seem confusing to me. I thought I would quote an authority so the novices reading the discuss
- /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00624.html (9,026 bytes)
- 2. Re: (Tech) sbc overbalance opinion (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:52:07 -0500
- Ok I give up... Why would you build a V-7?? An engine is never in 'balance' by the way.. it is only an approximation that shakes the least at the rpm of interest.. Did the inventor of the V-7 give an
- /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00625.html (10,461 bytes)
- 3. Re: (Tech) sbc overbalance opinion (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:03:24 -0800
- OK the reason for the V7 is--cheap--what a surprise. If you have all the V8 parts already it's a ton cheaper to make a spacer/weight than buy the parts for a V6 or destroker V8. The weight on Jacks c
- /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00627.html (11,948 bytes)
- 4. Re: (Tech) sbc overbalance opinion (score: 1)
- Author: ardunbill@webtv.net
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:25:16 -0500 (EST)
- Nevermind, it's gonna get cold here again tomorrow. We always get a little break here in January when we get a good South wind. Bill /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.ne
- /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00635.html (7,169 bytes)
- 5. Re: (Tech) sbc overbalance opinion (score: 1)
- Author: Nt788@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:59:48 EST
- << Hi Folks, been reading the messages about V8 and V7 crankshaft balancing >> JACK RESPONDS I'm sure glad I didn't have to understand this before I did it! /// unsubscribe/change address requests to
- /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00637.html (7,237 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu