Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ggl205@yahoo.com: 242 ]

Total 242 documents matching your query.

161. Re: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Jack, I would have to agree with you on the aluminum rod issue. So long as you keep them under compression, they are as reliable as steel. The only time I had problems with aluminum rods is when I de
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00311.html (9,295 bytes)

162. Re: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 13:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Yup, that's my take, mayf. Aluminum will also offer a small amount of "give" (in compression) to cushion added cylinder pressure from turbo or supercharger. __________________________________ Yahoo!
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00315.html (8,611 bytes)

163. Re: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 14:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, aluminum rod growth is a reality. You do set your engine up accordingly, right? Since RPM stretch does occur, manufacturers suggest a conservative range of cycles before replacement is necessary
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00318.html (8,854 bytes)

164. Re: Weight and Balance stuff again (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 08:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Glenn, are you referring solely to center of gravity (CG) and/or centroid axis (CA)? CA is weight located close to the centerline of the car (vertical axis or moment). CA varies quite a bit due to co
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00411.html (11,053 bytes)

165. Re: Weight and Balance stuff again (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Glenn, I would think that the farther away you place weight from the intersection of CG and CA, the more difficult it will be to control or change direction of that weight. I believe this was always
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00420.html (9,731 bytes)

166. Re: Weight and Balance stuff again (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
"Sorta like throwing a hammer, the heavy end always wants to lead." Then why would you want to add weight in back of the rear axle, thereby increasing the moment arm? John ___________________________
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00421.html (9,246 bytes)

167. Re: Weight and Balance stuff again (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
I respectfully disagree. Road racing cars are surely designed to increase tire patch grip via sound suspension design, chassis rigidity, springs, dampers, aero, etc. but straightline stability is one
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00424.html (11,218 bytes)

168. Re: Re: Weight and Balance stuff again (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 13:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
"John what % weight dist. front & rear did you shoot for with you Lakester?" I was trying for 50%/50% but ended up with something closer to 55% rear, 45% front. The last time I ran the car I was play
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00425.html (9,890 bytes)

169. Re: Weight and Balance stuff again (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 17:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
"we have an ordinary chevy pick up that acts like it is "on rails" at nearly 200MPH on the other hand I doubt that it would be very impressive as a road racer." That is what we all seek in our LSR ca
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00433.html (10,237 bytes)

170. Re: Weight and Balance stuff again (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 17:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
"The center of mass behind the center of gravity." Amen but not too far behind CG. Your statement above goes to the heart of my comment on CG intersect with CA. It may have been better for me to refe
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00434.html (10,718 bytes)

171. Re: Weight and Balance stuff again (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 18:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
"center of mass and the center of gravity....thought it was the same thing." Glenn, you are correct, CG and CM are the same. They both refer to a balance point. What I am apparently not saying proper
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00436.html (10,450 bytes)

172. Re: Oil Pumps (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 05:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
Sparky, would this electric pump work as a motorcycle engine dry sump pump? Are they reliable? __________________________________ SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com ///
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00443.html (8,323 bytes)

173. Re: Car Balance (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
John, go to the following site: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/rktcp.html __________________________________ SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com /// unsubscrib
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00478.html (7,844 bytes)

174. Re: Car Balance (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
"Are you game to do all the real math that is involved with curved panels, body interruptions like seams, wind screen moldings, under car aerodynamics?' Nope, not me mayf but the site does give a sim
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00487.html (9,452 bytes)

175. Re: Car Balance (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
Mayf, no need to be sorry but what happened to your entrepreneurial spirit? Sure, models are not the correct way to solve for CP but what is your alternative? It has to be better than trial and error
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00497.html (8,652 bytes)

176. Re: Car Balance (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
"I do know that airplanes and missiles are very simple compared to a car on the ground going at speeds which invoke some compressibility effects. Oh, well....to each his own." I couldn't agree more.
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00514.html (9,001 bytes)

177. RE: Weight and Balance stuff again (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Russel, I am not building anything at the moment. If all goes well, I will be at the 2004 meet in a streamliner (not mine). I will provide the power and drive train. My lakester is for sale although
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00530.html (9,574 bytes)

178. RE: Weight and Balance stuff again (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
Russel, I remember someone talking about Honda engines but it wasn't me. I will be using a 3.0L Toyota I6 engine. One fellow who did express a now fading interest in my lakester wanted to use a Honda
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00532.html (9,730 bytes)

179. Re: Weight and Balance stuff again (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Ahhh. Center of pressure. The final and most important part of my argument. The one component that answers why we want low polar moments of inertia for high speed stability. Before center of pressure
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00539.html (9,416 bytes)

180. Re: Weight bias/tire pressure (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 05:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
"Now what is the left to right weight, would be good to add the driver to this one." Excellent points, John. Driver weight should be part of all chassis measurements relative to handling. I run the r
/html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00547.html (7,701 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu