Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net: 124 ]

Total 124 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Tire reliabilty, and traction control (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 21:28:27 -0600
Skip and I weren't at World Finals. I'm thinking Skip was talking about an earlier Turbinator tire problem (Speed Week or WoS) that I seem to remember hearing about. Quite a promotional on the MT ti
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00047.html (11,379 bytes)

62. Re: TC thought (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 21:40:49 -0600
Right, the fastest machines will probably always have some skips, considering all the suspension technology I've heard anything about (unless we can get unsprung weight down to about 6lb per wheel).
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00049.html (12,103 bytes)

63. Re: TC (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 21:58:59 -0600
Your impression (that I meant that TC should be required) must not have been so "stupid", as you say-- 3 or 4 other smart people seem to have read it the same way you did. I also wonder if somebody
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00050.html (10,001 bytes)

64. Re: Tire reliabilty, and traction control (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 00:34:24 -0600
like I said, I think some of the more powerful cars are killing their tires with wheelspin. I want them to have the option of TC to try to help prevent high speed tire failures. I haven't seen the t
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00053.html (11,745 bytes)

65. Re: Tire reliabilty, and traction control (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 00:39:48 -0600
profanity doesn't bother me a bit. When I get worked-up, I've even been known to use a little, myself. Especially when I'm working with sheet metal. If you weren't passionate about your sport, you l
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00054.html (9,193 bytes)

66. Re: Tire reliabilty, and traction control (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 01:14:09 -0600
I've been looking in particular for your response. Thanks for the excellent information! HEY, LIST-- see that about the tire blisters? I'm not saying that blisters can't come from overload (only)--
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00055.html (10,968 bytes)

67. Re: TC (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 22:01:41 -0600
O.K. Tom, Bryan, Glen, Pork.Pie, Rick, DrMayf-- I am finally getting around to all those comments about "roostertails" (although I did comment to Tom already as part of a broader-scope response) Firs
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00092.html (15,984 bytes)

68. Re: TC (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 19:38:50 -0600
I watched both trucks make several passes. My impressions were that the Phoenix (I think that's the green 1942 that you mentioned) does a significantly better job managing back-half airflow, and the
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00133.html (9,502 bytes)

69. Re: new class? (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 20:05:48 -0600
Never get it approved for LSR. With the gyros, it takes too much control away from the driver. Russ Mack /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message t
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00135.html (7,889 bytes)

70. Re: fabrication (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 20:55:06 -0600
I appreciate your perspective on this. It certainly describes the way I feel about some of the machines-- the #77 comes to mind, for one. Russ Mack /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list ///
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00140.html (9,627 bytes)

71. Re: TC (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 21:29:59 -0600
I certainly agree with you critique re "poor communication". In retrospect, think I probably should have re-stated things that I thought were obvious, just so you guys would realize that I understoo
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00143.html (9,820 bytes)

72. Re: TC (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 23:33:05 -0600
a tugboat? what a thought! I think somebody is "woofin" you. Here, wait just a second. That calls for looking up the real info-- the program from Speedweek. Fortunately for us, both those trucks wer
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00150.html (10,222 bytes)

73. Re: new class? (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 23:51:53 -0600
Yes, I do love new concepts! LSR is going to really have some work to do with this one, though. Continuing with your ideas-- if you lean forward, you better get horizontal pretty quick-- otherwise,
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00153.html (9,147 bytes)

74. Re: Gyroscopic Effects (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 12:30:16 -0600
Exactly. But w/resp. to the wheels-- since we much prefer to be vertical & go straight in LSR, I've been thinking that perimeter-weighted wheels might be a benefit to LSR 2-wheelers. Russ Mack /// /
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00186.html (7,422 bytes)

75. Re: lakester frame (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2001 00:02:09 -0600
"Tipo 61" was referred to as "the Birdcage Maserati". Seem to remember that they continued the small-tube space-frame concept through one or two additional models-- don't know if one was designated
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00247.html (10,103 bytes)

76. Re: Gyro Effect of Heavy Motorcycle Wheels (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 15:25:49 -0600
these points are all quite logical and well thought-out. Making me think some more about my notion of heavy LSR bike wheels (at least w/ resp. to the front). Do you know of a published engineering s
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00283.html (12,058 bytes)

77. Re: MC-CHASSIS-DESIGN -LSR wheels (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:58:56 -0600
I agree w/Dale-- really excellent analysis of two sources of motorcycle instability. Thanks. Russ /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to major
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00332.html (10,962 bytes)

78. Re: LSR HISTORY (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:36:55 -0600
because none of the rest of us are old enough to remember him. Russ Mack /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// w
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00344.html (9,016 bytes)

79. Re: LSR HISTORY (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:51:03 -0600
Just kidding. Feeling kinda old, myself (except when I'm around Skip.) Seriously, I think your suggestion about Seagrave deserves all our support. Russ Mack /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00352.html (9,113 bytes)

80. Re: LSR HISTORY (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 10:18:24 -0600
why certainly, what else could I have meant? Of course there is also the fact that your own youthfull enthusiasm is so contageous! Russ /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscr
/html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00396.html (9,740 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu