Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*An\s+interesting\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*An\s+interesting\s+question\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. Re: An interesting question (score: 1): Author: Awgertoo@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:22:08 EST; I doubt there was any legislation aimed directly at knock-offs but rather at projecting hood ornaments, bumper overriders, etc. etc. that must certainly have been quite pedestrian-unfriendly. Remembe; /html/healeys/2005-12/msg00444.html (8,770 bytes)
22. Re: An interesting question (score: 1): Author: N5572B@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:18:49 EST; As I recall the reason for the ban was the theory that the wings of the spinners would inflict damage on pedestrians who might come in contact with them. This goes along with banning certain types of; /html/healeys/2005-12/msg00445.html (8,528 bytes)
23. Re: An Interesting Question (score: 1): Author: "Bob Johnson" <robert.w.johnson@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:38:50 -0500; Well, after looking at the James Bond Aston-Martin we now know why the spinners were banned. It was that James Bond Aston Martin option of the 3-eared spinners that could be used as tire slashers! Th; /html/healeys/2005-12/msg00447.html (7,953 bytes)
24. Re: An interesting question (score: 1): Author: GSFuqua1@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:04:56 EST; Yeah, but just think.....What a way to go!!! Gary Fuqua Branson, MO; /html/healeys/2005-12/msg00448.html (7,580 bytes)
25. Re: An interesting question (score: 1): Author: Alan Schultz <alan@andysnet.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:35:07 -0600; Wrong chest! They were referred to as Dagmar's. They were probably of equal size however. Alan Schultz Once an owner of a 56 Caddy Coupe DeVille (Man what a boat weighed in at 5500 lbs); /html/healeys/2005-12/msg00454.html (7,975 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 25
Page: [1] [2]