- 1. Re: [Healeys] Healeys Digest, Vol 1, Issue 182 (score: 1)
- Author: Editorgary@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:09:13 EDT
- I don't think that's true; used to be because during the first year of their manufacture for Healeys there was a high failure rate due to a bad bonding process between the control box and the base, b
- /html/healeys/2007-09/msg00329.html (7,700 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Healeys] Healeys Digest, Vol 1, Issue 182 (score: 1)
- Author: <sbyers@ec.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:22:45 -0400
- Since that's my quote you used, let me say that I was not knocking Pertronix. I was just saying that my experience on the list over more than 10 years is that everytime this topic has come up, about
- /html/healeys/2007-09/msg00330.html (8,585 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Healeys] Healeys Digest, Vol 1, Issue 182 (score: 1)
- Author: "Leonard Hartnett" <thehartnetts@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:41:56 -0700
- Steve: Not what Gary is looking for but for your information, I installed my Pertronix in July, 2000. I have driven approximately 27,000 miles since then. It has not missed a beat and I am very happy
- /html/healeys/2007-09/msg00342.html (10,057 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu