- 1. [Healeys] 100 Timing chain tensioner question (score: 1)
- Author: Bert Van Brande <bertvanbrande@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
- Is there a consensus on the 100 4-cyl timing chain tensioner ring? When searching the archives I find a lot of compelling arguments for leaving it out as well as arguments for putting in a new tensio
- /html/healeys/2011-08/msg00065.html (7,908 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Healeys] 100 Timing chain tensioner question (score: 1)
- Author: "Rich Chrysler" <richchrysler@quickclic.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:40:04 -0400
- The possibility of the rubber tensioner ring breaking up will occur with one that's 55 years old, having become old and brittle. A new one will certainly be there to do its job, shouldn't break up a
- /html/healeys/2011-08/msg00066.html (8,735 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Healeys] 100 Timing chain tensioner question (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:13:46 -0500
- I agree with Rich, although when I took my 100 motor apart I discovered the same thing, tensioner missing, no apparant bad sounds or ill effects, but a new one should make timing more precise, reduce
- /html/healeys/2011-08/msg00069.html (7,197 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Healeys] 100 Timing chain tensioner question (score: 1)
- Author: "Carr&Edwards" <scvc70@epix.net>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 12:38:18 -0400
- Some time ago I posted a question about the necessity of the tensioner, as my engine rebuilder found it impossible to get the sprocket on the shaft with the tensioner installed. His opinion was that
- /html/healeys/2011-08/msg00084.html (8,716 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu