Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+new\s+pushrod\s+tubes\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+new\s+pushrod\s+tubes\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [FOT] new pushrod tubes? (score: 1): Author: Chris Kantarjiev <cak@dimebank.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:03:56 -0700 (PDT); We all know that the aluminum pushrod tubes are a ... flawed design at best. I've attacked the problem with epoxy and green loctite and they both sort of work, but nothing is perfect. I see that Moss; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00130.html (6,800 bytes)
2. RE: [FOT] new pushrod tubes? (score: 1): Author: "Bill Babcock" <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:09:18 -0700; Actually a good whack with a tapered thingy works fine. I made one on my lathe out of aluminum and every time I have a head apart I whack the tubes before I stick it back together. Mine never leak. A; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00132.html (7,924 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]