Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+Trans\s+Mount\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+Trans\s+Mount\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [FOT] Trans Mount (score: 1): Author: malaboge@aol.com; Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:26:01 -0400; Fellow gear bangers Here is a thought on how to maintain a bit of flex, and yet thwart the feared "tranny flop". I've used this for some time and it seems to just keep keepin on...but then I'm kinda; /html/fot/2006-08/msg00454.html (7,683 bytes)
2. Re: [FOT] Trans Mount (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:55:10 -0500; Hi Nick -- I use the same system and it has worked in my car very well. I've replaced the rear mount only once in ten years, and that probably wasn't necessary. This system lets the engine vibrate bu; /html/fot/2006-08/msg00455.html (8,554 bytes)
3. Re: [FOT] Trans Mount (score: 1): Author: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:26:47 -0400; Real men solid mount their motors (but still use rubber at the trans mount). Shane Ingate, filling-less in Maryland ;); /html/fot/2006-08/msg00459.html (6,811 bytes)
4. RE: [FOT] Trans Mount (score: 1): Author: "Bill Babcock" <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:31:09 -0700; Been there, done that, got the broken Weber manifold. --Original Message-- From: owner-fot@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-fot@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of SHANE Ingate Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006; /html/fot/2006-08/msg00460.html (7,228 bytes)
5. RE: [FOT] Trans Mount (score: 1): Author: "Henry Frye" <henry@henryfrye.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:17:41 -0400; Been there as well. Didn't break anything, but realized it is really important to isolate the engine from the car for LOTS of reasons. Been there, done that, got the broken Weber manifold. Real men s; /html/fot/2006-08/msg00461.html (6,996 bytes)
6. Re: [FOT] Trans Mount (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Arnold" <triosan@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:25:57 -0700; what is the effect if rngine has one solid mount [header/weber side] and one stock mount and tranny is hard mounted? -- Chuck Arnold; /html/fot/2006-08/msg00463.html (7,122 bytes)
7. RE: [FOT] Trans Mount (score: 1): Author: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:35:57 -0400; I've braced my Cannon manifold by running supports from the inlet ends of the manifold down to the engine mount; I figure there is a lot of weight hanging off the head on that side of the motor so i; /html/fot/2006-08/msg00475.html (8,284 bytes)
8. Re: [FOT] Trans Mount (score: 1): Author: "Kas Kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:49:43 -0700; I braced my manifolds from the center down to the bottom edge of the block with a rubber button on the bottom of the steel tube brace, so the support was there not not extra vibration. Never Be beate; /html/fot/2006-08/msg00477.html (9,017 bytes)
9. Re: [FOT] Trans Mount (score: 1): Author: "riverside" <riverside@Cedar-Rapids.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:07:33 -0500; sounds alot like the Weber brace found on a fine wet liner motor from Italy. At the trans, I used a pair of old valve springs to provide some compliance in an otherwise solid mount. art de armond --; /html/fot/2006-08/msg00478.html (10,597 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]