- 81. Re: [FOT] WooHoo! (score: 1)
- Author: Hugh Barber <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:08:07 -0800
- I'll be towing my TR6 from California to Virginia this week. Actually, I'll be towing the '6, with a motorcycle in the pickup bed, and my yellow Lab in the cab with me (oh joy!).Would love to go to H
- /html/fot/2006-03/msg00333.html (6,277 bytes)
- 82. Re: [FOT] ignition problem (score: 1)
- Author: Hugh Barber <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 10:03:01 -0400
- Is Henry becoming FOT's Occam ? /entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem /...like Henry Frye, my hero of last weekend says, "simple is good". Or something like that.
- /html/fot/2006-04/msg00153.html (6,660 bytes)
- 83. Re: [FOT] Modern brake fluid/rebuilt Triumph components (score: 1)
- Author: Hugh Barber <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 21:10:11 -0400
- Everyone seems to be addressing the Castrol LMA vs. DOT5 Silicone fluid question, but there are other fluids out there as well. Has anyone on the list used the DOT 5.1 hi-temp fluids or the Valvoline
- /html/fot/2006-06/msg00021.html (8,086 bytes)
- 84. Re: [FOT] Modern brake fluid/rebuilt Triumph components (score: 1)
- Author: Hugh Barber <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:13:34 -0400
- Back in the "bad old days", putting DOT 3 in your TR was a sure fire way to screw up the brake/clutch system seals.....
- /html/fot/2006-06/msg00052.html (9,475 bytes)
- 85. Re: [FOT] Modern brake fluid/rebuilt Triumph components (score: 1)
- Author: Hugh Barber <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:22:15 -0400
- I had heard that while DOT 3 & 4 were polyethylene glycol based, some of the new DOT 5.1 fluids were borate ester based..........
- /html/fot/2006-06/msg00060.html (9,131 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu