Mail Archive Search: <+from:mattspit@worldnet.att.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:mattspit@worldnet.att.net: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: king bearings (score: 1): Author: matt matthews <mattspit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:09:09 -0500; I have a 1500 FP Spitfire. The previous owner was running second in the run offs when he broke (not the engine) in the 80s. He did lots of testing to figure out how to make the bottom end of this eng; /html/fot/2004-04/msg00311.html (10,810 bytes)
22. Re: Memories (score: 1): Author: matt matthews <mattspit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 23:54:10 -0500; Running a bug eye at Bridgehampton during a NASCAR Weekend and needing some rear end fluid. Petty looked down at us and essentially get lost sporty car boy but a guy was unloading a purple ford by hi; /html/fot/2004-01/msg00046.html (8,913 bytes)
23. Re: Fuel injection in Vintage events (score: 1): Author: matt matthews <mattspit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:48:46 -0500; Back in the 60's, I would have let you run Modified with FI in a Spit. I don't race vintage but that would be the class, something like F modified, depending on displacement.; /html/fot/2003-12/msg00158.html (8,355 bytes)
24. spitfire rear end ratio (score: 1): Author: matt matthews <mattspit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:14:37 -0500; I know Triumph never offered a 3.4 rear end ratio to fit into the Spitfire rear end housing, but does anyone know of a ratio near 3.4 from another car that could be fit into the housing?; /html/fot/2003-11/msg00100.html (7,075 bytes)
25. Re: spitfire rear end ratio (score: 1): Author: matt matthews <mattspit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:45:53 -0500; Thanks for all the info but The rules allow me any rear end ratio. The limitation is they need to fit inside the standard housing. As you all point out they did not make something close to 3.4 just 3; /html/fot/2003-11/msg00111.html (8,624 bytes)
26. SCCA runoffs (score: 1): Author: matt matthews <mattspit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 17:18:54 -0500; What happened to Sargus? Why did he not finish?; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00055.html (6,365 bytes)
27. Re: [FOT] acceleration forces (score: 1): Author: matt matthews <mattspit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:59:23 -0600; 1500 cc Triumph Spitfire 3.2 rear Quafe tranny Relatively stock suspension geometry, Stock rocker rear New Goodyear slicks GT6 brakes Max lateral 1.3 to 1.4 G deceleration 0.8 G acceleration depends; /html/fot/2006-03/msg00229.html (6,892 bytes)
28. Re: [FOT] acceleration forces (score: 1): Author: matt matthews <mattspit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 00:20:54 -0600; I have seen my oil pressure hold in a 4th gear 6000 RPM high speed long corner, go down to 30 with an accusump on hard breaking at the end of the corner, down to near or at zero on a hard 2nd gear co; /html/fot/2006-03/msg00232.html (7,343 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]