Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Poll\s+$I\s+like\s+high\s+windshields$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Poll\s+$I\s+like\s+high\s+windshields$\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re:Poll (I like high windshields) (score: 1): Author: Mark Dent <stickerman@home.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:33:41 -0500; Someone has to speak up up for us. I can not be the only one who likes the high windshields, my favorite is the 68 1600 ( I have had 2) Why? 1. I like 68 because of no side marker lamps 2. I like 160; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00744.html (7,777 bytes)
2. Re:Poll (I like high windshields) (score: 1): Author: GOAVP@aol.com; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:27:03 EST; I like Datsun roadsters because I think they are good looking and I can fit in one. I like high windshields because I don't fit in the low windshield cars. I like the '68 2000 because that's what I o; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00745.html (7,278 bytes)
3. Re:Poll (I like high windshields) (score: 1): Author: Paul.Kort@marconimed.com; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 06:56:57 -0500; Please respond to Mark Dent <stickerman@home.com> To: Gary McCormick <svgkm@halley.ca.essd.northgrum.com> But I always thought that, of the tall windshield models, the '69 looked the best, ... becaus; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00772.html (7,827 bytes)
4. Re:Poll (I like high windshields) (score: 1): Author: Philip Erickson <philip.erickson@Agouron.COM>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 08:38:04 -0800; I like high windshield 2000s (1969, but any year would do) with the vent windows, side makers, door locks, jack points, rear reflectors, liceince plate lights, and bumper guards removed. Oh Ya, Add s; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00776.html (7,563 bytes)
5. Re:Poll (I like high windshields) (score: 1): Author: Dan Neff <neffster189@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:40:07 -0800 (PST); "Jon Wissler" <Jon_Wissler@pngc.com> posed: the I gather the (USA) 67.5 2000 Solex is the #1 choice for collectors. The 1600 might be the 'standard', due to relative production volume. but Peter van; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00787.html (8,693 bytes)
6. Re: Poll (I like high windshields) (score: 1): Author: Jimmy J Claypool <a68srl311@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:51:46 -0800; I like high windshield cars also. I am not anywhere near as tall as you guys 5-9, but with a hat on in my friends 67.5 it stuck over the windshield. i like the 68's for the lack of side marker and li; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00788.html (8,197 bytes)
7. Re: Poll (I like high windshields) (score: 1): Author: B Strachan <bstrachan@home.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:26:29 -0800; I'm seeing some negative comments about U20 reliability in this thread. I have a lot of hours driving U20s and yes, I know what it's like to break a timing chain :-( However, if you start with an in-; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00802.html (8,022 bytes)
8. Re:Poll (I like high windshields) (score: 1): Author: greg_behrens@urscorp.com; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 08:31:00 -0600; I like Datsun roadsters because I think they are good looking and I can fit in one. I like high windshields because I don't fit in the low windshield cars. I like the '68 2000 because that's what I o; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00823.html (7,388 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]