Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Next\s+issue\s+for\s+the\s+roadsters\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Next\s+issue\s+for\s+the\s+roadsters\!\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: "Paul" <9laser3@bright.net>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 11:47:22 -0400; Hey roadster fanatics. I just got a note from the editor of the new Classic Motorsports, Gary Anderson, that the next issue will be a replay of CAR & DRIVERS September 1966 comparison test of the Dat; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00425.html (8,508 bytes)
2. Re: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: Roadster Dude <roadstrdude@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 10:53:17 -0700 (PDT); Did everyone get the post that I sent out about the magazine shoot?? Or maybe Paul missed it?? Paul did you get the post titled Sunday ...The summer officially started for me.. Its weird that after; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00429.html (9,263 bytes)
3. Re: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 17:58:19 -0400; Life is strange! I replaced my wall unit in my bedroom yesterday and guess what magazine I found - the Sept 66 issue of Car & Driver. Ken Miles, driver extradonaire, was the test pilot for the articl; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00435.html (8,445 bytes)
4. Re: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 17:59:19 -0400; I got it but your links didn't work. Mike /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00436.html (8,006 bytes)
5. Re: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: Roadster Dude <roadstrdude@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 15:17:13 -0700 (PDT); Hello Mike... Sorry about that.. Lets see if this one works.. www.picturetrail.com/roadstrdude/ Thanks, Raul Mike -- The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00437.html (8,389 bytes)
6. Re: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: "Paul" <9laser3@bright.net>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 18:24:41 -0400; Paul Kort brakes. /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00438.html (9,436 bytes)
7. RE: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: "Gordon Glasgow" <gsglasgow@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 16:08:53 -0700; I know this was a recreation of a C&D test from 1966, but I've always wondered why all these comparisons rarely include a 2000. After all, the TR4 is a 2+ litre (2138cc, to be precise). Gordon Glasgo; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00439.html (9,191 bytes)
8. RE: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: "Brian Hollands" <Brian_Hollands@adp.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 19:21:06 -0400; Because they want to make it fair. Brian '69 2000 Tampa, FL web.Tampabay.rr.com/oilleak --Original Message-- I've always wondered why all these comparisons rarely include a 2000. After all, the TR4 i; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00440.html (8,293 bytes)
9. Re: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: "Paul" <9laser3@bright.net>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 19:47:34 -0400; Not too sure if it has anything to do with "fair"? The MG-B has 1798cc, the Sunbeam has 1722cc while the Fiat has only 1480cc. The TR4 had IRS. The Fiat and Alfa both have 5 speeds while the rest ran; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00441.html (9,510 bytes)
10. RE: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: "Gordon Glasgow" <gsglasgow@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 18:44:57 -0700; But then all the Brit-car enthusiasts go around talking about how the Datsuns never compared very well to the Triumphs and MGBs. No offense meant to the Brit-car enthusiasts on this list, BTW. They k; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00442.html (9,535 bytes)
11. FW: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: "Brian Hollands" <Brian_Hollands@adp.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 22:39:19 -0400; Mikunis). >The British simply didn't have anything that could compete with the 2000 at (barely) Precisely. Brian 69 2000 Tampa, FL /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list /// Archives at ht; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00444.html (8,507 bytes)
12. Re: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: Roadster Dude <roadstrdude@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 22:04:44 -0700 (PDT); I had over 80 views on my album..and the only one that reply to my original post was Calspeed.. Why is that...you guys hate me because im beautiful?? And everyone is replying to Paul's post.. You guy; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00450.html (9,388 bytes)
13. Re: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: CafeRC51@aol.com; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 01:29:34 EDT; Well.... we all love you too. But Paul rocks! ;>) Calspeed /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00451.html (8,477 bytes)
14. Re: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 06:24:27 -0400; What I did find strange is that he thought the driving position of the Alfa to be good. I test drove two prior to purchasing my Miata and I thought it was horrible - you need to be built like a goril; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00454.html (8,090 bytes)
15. RE: Next issue for the roadsters! (score: 1): Author: "" <linob@sentex.net>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 08:24:40 -0400; Just thought I'd share a modern day comparison between MG/Triumph and Datsun. I have a 2L solex '68, my brother just purchased a very nice '74 Tr6; he thought his 'big 6' was faster then my 'little'; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-05/msg00457.html (10,449 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]