Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*69\s+for\s+sale\s+is\s+not\s+mine\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*69\s+for\s+sale\s+is\s+not\s+mine\!\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. 69 for sale is not mine! (score: 1): Author: "Fred Katz" <fredkatz@2xtreme.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:15:21 -0800; Talk about a shock, I just looked at the 69 roadster up for sale on eBay, and it's my car! http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=271168787 Actually, it's a picture of my '66 2L in f; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00898.html (7,638 bytes)
2. Re: 69 for sale is not mine! (score: 1): Author: "J Friederich" <jfried@anv.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 21:37:33 -0800; I have no idea who this is, but he better not give NV roadster owners a bad -John F. '69 2000 Solex, Las Vegas, NV; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00904.html (8,142 bytes)
3. Re: 69 for sale is not mine! (score: 1): Author: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:34:40 -0800; Well, he does say in the ad "Picture is not actual car, just a reference, but looks almost the same." Still, it makes one wonder what the real car looks like. -- Gordon Glasgow http://www.gordon-glas; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00905.html (8,651 bytes)
4. Re: 69 for sale is not mine! (score: 1): Author: "Fred Katz" <fredkatz@2xtreme.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:49:42 -0800; I hope he has a sense of humor. Someone felt he might be in violation of the law by misrepresentation. The pic has been updated with another reference car! Fred -- but looks like. bad eBay, '69 inter; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00906.html (9,394 bytes)
5. Re: 69 for sale is not mine! (score: 1): Author: "Kerry Zariwny" <kzariwny@home.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:52:08 -0800; Check this puppy out now! http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=271168787 If this is worth 6 grand, my roadster is worth a mint! I guess our roadsters are rising in value! <Grin!> Wa; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00907.html (10,430 bytes)
6. Re: 69 for sale is not mine! (score: 1): Author: Mark <captainhoek@postmark.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 06:45:44 -0600; Oooohhhhhhh boy! That's a real winner! I think what we have here is not misrepresentation with intent to defraud. What we have here is major CLUELESSNESS! If he wanted to defraud anyone, would he pos; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00911.html (7,868 bytes)
7. RE: 69 for sale is not mine! (score: 1): Author: Andrew Murphy <andrew.murphy@integtech.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 07:27:28 -0800; Is this some kind of joke? First we get a picture of Fred's car looking like a million bucks, then we get a picture of a wreck looking like five bucks. This guy is either just playing a joke on ever; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00916.html (10,990 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]