Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*510\s+rear\s+end\,\s+hmmmmmm\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*510\s+rear\s+end\,\s+hmmmmmm\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. 510 rear end, hmmmmmm (score: 1): Author: HIGHKIX4@aol.com; Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 08:09:53 EDT; For all: I was looking for the jack for the 510 under by the spare tire (its under the front seat, as I found out), but was struck by the amazing similarity of the rear axle to the roadster. Wonder i; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00702.html (7,772 bytes)
2. Re: 510 rear end, hmmmmmm (score: 1): Author: Ronnie Day <ronday@home.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 08:50:10 -0500; Jim, If I didn't send you the URL for the Dime Quarterly site, here it is: http://dimequarterly.tierranet.com/ Spend some time exploring the Web Links found under Resources in the left (long) frame.; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00703.html (8,995 bytes)
3. Re: 510 rear end, hmmmmmm (score: 1): Author: Jim Tyler <toplessdatsun@ga.prestige.net>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 21:34:11 -0400; I have heard the wag rears are a direct fit, but I haven't ever swapped one myself so I can't say for sure. I have also heard that with the truck rears you have to swap the side gears that the axles; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00717.html (8,417 bytes)
4. Re: 510 rear end, hmmmmmm (score: 1): Author: Mike Poorboy <bitterrootprop@nidlink.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 18:49:25 -0700; I looked up the part numbers for the wagon and the roadster and they are the same part numbers. According to the Nissan parts manual the wagon came with 3.88 (3.90) or the 3.70 both are the same as t; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00718.html (9,025 bytes)
5. Re: 510 rear end, hmmmmmm (score: 1): Author: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 18:10:52 -0700; The roadster rear track width is 47.24". The 510 wagon rear track width is 49.6" -- Gordon Glasgow http://www.gordon-glasgow.org; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00740.html (8,839 bytes)
6. Re: 510 rear end, hmmmmmm (score: 1): Author: "sidney raper" <spl310@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 19:14:16 EDT; Didn't they use different wheels which would alter the rear track to a certain extent? Sid ________________________________________________________________________; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00784.html (9,716 bytes)
7. Re: 510 rear end, hmmmmmm (score: 1): Author: Jim Tyler <toplessdatsun@ga.prestige.net>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 21:11:24 -0400; I was referring to just the chunk itself, not to the whole axle assembly. Hope this helps, Jim; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00786.html (9,318 bytes)
8. Re: 510 rear end, hmmmmmm (score: 1): Author: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 18:31:12 -0700; Yeah, the 510's have 13" wheels, but I doubt if there was an inch difference in offset on each side. -- Gordon Glasgow http://www.gordon-glasgow.org; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00788.html (10,276 bytes)
9. Re: 510 rear end, hmmmmmm (score: 1): Author: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 19:03:33 -0700; I got onto this thread a little late and had already deleted (other) Jim's original note. Yes, the gear carriers are the same. If anyone is looking to swap just the ring and pinion, I'd check the rin; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00789.html (9,906 bytes)
10. Re: 510 rear end, hmmmmmm (score: 1): Author: Mike Poorboy <bitterrootprop@nidlink.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 19:17:29 -0700; Gordon and List, I checked the part manual and the ring gear bolt part numbers are the same in both rear ends. Mike; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00790.html (10,456 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]