- 1. "Pseudo-Scientific" Pertronics Test Update (score: 1)
- Author: "David R. Conrad" <conrad1@gte.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 10:02:44 -1000
- To all those who've been following the Pertronics performance investigation: Distributor "A" (points--all new components) now installed and running. Problem had been bad spade connector, at dist. for
- /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00711.html (12,563 bytes)
- 2. Re: "Pseudo-Scientific" Pertronics Test Update (score: 1)
- Author: Marc Sayer <msayer1@concentric.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 14:41:08 -0700
- I am glad to see someone approaching this question with at least a semblance of scientific theory. Most times guys simply start talking about how good or bad they think such and such an ignition prod
- /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00736.html (13,292 bytes)
- 3. Re: "Pseudo-Scientific" Pertronics Test Update (score: 1)
- Author: "James W. Anable, Jr." <anable@halcyon.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 00:14:32 -0700
- What about point bounce/float at high rpm's? What about multiple spark discharge in cars with high compression and radical cams, or capacitive discharge, higher voltage coils? Another plus with high
- /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00754.html (7,646 bytes)
- 4. Re: "Pseudo-Scientific" Pertronics Test Update (score: 1)
- Author: Marc Sayer <msayer1@concentric.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 11:55:37 -0700
- I think you missed my point. I was saying the breakerless system *by itself* does not offer any significant performance improvement over a perfectly setup and properly working points system. If you s
- /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg00771.html (8,509 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu