Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*distributors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*distributors\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. distributors (score: 1): Author: Simon Sparrow <Simon.Sparrow@wang.co.nz>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 11:47:53 +1300; Does anyone have any comments about the Mallory twin point distributors vs. the stock Rover/P76 ones. I currently use a Rover/P76 distributor in my car, fitted with an optical ignition kit (lumeniti; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-01/msg00003.html (7,074 bytes)
2. Re: distributors (score: 1): Author: Jim Stuart <jimbb88@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:16:48 -0500; There have been many discussions on the MG list regards dual point vs stock dizzys. The consensus seemed to be that little was actually gained by going to the dual point. Most comparisons are unfair; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-01/msg00006.html (8,440 bytes)
3. Re: distributors (score: 1): Author: Jack Emery <jemery@mint.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 17:39:19 -0500; IMHO the Rover with vac advance and the luminition would be better in a mildly cammed road motor. In NZ Lucas caps and Rotors are common as Delco here. But...a new dizzy is a good dizzy. We use a Bui; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-01/msg00011.html (7,849 bytes)
4. Re: distributors (score: 1): Author: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 23:19:50 +1100; Simon, Rangie Spares in Melbourne, Australia sell a distributor conversion but they need the old dizzie for the lower drive gear. The replacement dizzie is a Bosch unit from a Holden. I don't know if; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-01/msg00016.html (7,275 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]