Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\s+Mounts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\s+Mounts\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Engine Mounts (score: 1): Author: Kris & Bill Wessale <wessale@iwl.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 21:56:38 -0600; Here's a detailed question about BOP 215 engine mounts. I have engine mounts that have 15/32" holes for the bolts that go into block, but the block bolt holes are only 3/8". This leaves 3/32" of slop; /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-02/msg00008.html (7,053 bytes)
2. Re: Engine Mounts (score: 1): Author: Shadow@RTD.COM (The Shadow Knows...); Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:01:41 -0700 (MST); (1) Ma friend.... you are looking at genuine US of A mass (or mess) auto production clearance factors. It is (was) assumed the engine would not move laterally or vertically with respect to these (tho; /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-02/msg00010.html (9,119 bytes)
3. Re: Engine Mounts (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 17:25:47 -0800; Bill, I have not changed any mounts in recent years but your description sounds just like the ones I remember changing years ago on my 61 Olds F-85. Dave K. **; /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-02/msg00022.html (7,477 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]