Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cam\s+Lobe\s+Wear\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cam\s+Lobe\s+Wear\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Cam Lobe Wear (score: 1): Author: Simon Sparrow <Simon.Sparrow@wang.co.nz>; Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 09:57:06 +1200; Thanks for the help Bob. When I was doing my comparison of valve lifts I was turning the engine over using the starter motor, so hopefully the lifters would have not leaked down too much. To measure; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-04/msg00006.html (9,664 bytes)
2. RE: Cam Lobe Wear (score: 1): Author: Simon Sparrow <Simon.Sparrow@wang.co.nz>; Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 10:53:22 +1200; Hi Bob, Good idea, I've observed the pushrods spinning before but I'll take another look this weekend to check they're all doing it. I know what you mean about the 1.5-2mm being about 20-25% of total; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-04/msg00007.html (8,591 bytes)
3. RE: Cam Lobe Wear (score: 1): Author: Simon Sparrow <Simon.Sparrow@wang.co.nz>; Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 12:40:24 +1200; Hi Peter, Haven't heard from you for a while. I guess my thinking behind just replacing the chain is that I'll avoid having to purchase another inlet manifold gasket (about $200NZ). If I just replace; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-04/msg00009.html (9,963 bytes)
4. Re: Cam Lobe Wear (score: 1): Author: "Gregg Feldman" <theaterwiz@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 23:12:44 -0400; Those are my thoughts exactly..only in US Dollars...;-) How ever , I have 150,000 miles on my 1988 NAS Range Rover and figure the bottom should be good for another 100,000 , so if I spend a grand now; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-04/msg00010.html (7,384 bytes)
5. RE: Cam Lobe Wear (score: 1): Author: Simon Sparrow <Simon.Sparrow@wang.co.nz>; Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 15:39:52 +1200; As with my situation, its tricky to know. You can check out your engine like I've done (check timing chain slack, valve lift, compression etc.)and if it all looks reasonable go for the low-buck appro; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-04/msg00011.html (8,451 bytes)
6. RE: Cam Lobe Wear (score: 1): Author: Simon Sparrow <Simon.Sparrow@wang.co.nz>; Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 08:55:46 +1200; Hi Peter, I guess it's an example of where do you stop once you start. If the cam is replaced I've understood that replacing the valve springs as well is also a good idea. They're all part of the sam; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-04/msg00013.html (8,834 bytes)
7. Re: Cam Lobe Wear (score: 1): Author: "Rich Atherton" <gumby@connectexpress.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 13:41:26 -0700; Sorry I haven't been on here in a while, and not sure if this has been answered yet or not. (still have 90 to read through!). I can tell you from experience that you are working ith a tired engine, t; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-04/msg00024.html (12,026 bytes)
8. RE: Cam Lobe Wear (score: 1): Author: Simon Sparrow <Simon.Sparrow@wang.co.nz>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 08:57:02 +1200; Thanks for the thoughts Rich. I basically agree that there is not much point in upgrading some of the engine as it will put undue pressure on the rest of it. My engine's history is unkown to me as I; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-04/msg00025.html (13,075 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]