Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CAM\/INLET\/CARB\s+RECOMENDATIONS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CAM\/INLET\/CARB\s+RECOMENDATIONS\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. CAM/INLET/CARB RECOMENDATIONS (score: 1): Author: John Bartholomew <jdb70@minerva.amdahl.com>; Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 17:15:04 -0700; Hey there listers, I have finally got my ROVER engine stripped and the block and crank are at the shop being renovated! Having stipped this sucker down, I know I need to replace the cam and lifters a; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-05/msg00033.html (9,789 bytes)
2. Re: CAM/INLET/CARB RECOMENDATIONS (score: 1): Author: Jim Stuart <jimbb88@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 21:53:10 -0400; Everyone will have a different bit of advice, as most of us think we have the best possible setup ourselves. That aside, the Buick/Olds 4bbl intake is a very good manifold, fairly easy to find among; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-05/msg00034.html (11,058 bytes)
3. Re: CAM/INLET/CARB RECOMENDATIONS (score: 1): Author: "Lode" <lode@glo.be>; Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 09:13:22 +0200; Instead of boring the block, why don't you put in some 3.9 sleeves and They shouldn't be that expensive. I would also advice Vitesse valves (bigger and cheap) Go for a Holley carb and an Offenhauser; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-05/msg00035.html (10,824 bytes)
4. Re: CAM/INLET/CARB RECOMENDATIONS (score: 1): Author: Ian Crocker <ian@btcase.bt.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 10:50:02 +0100 (BST); I have the Crane 218 (#900571). This works well with ported heads and has a broad torque spread coming on cam at about 2500rpm. I don't know how Crane decide on the RPM range as detailed on their sp; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-05/msg00036.html (8,363 bytes)
5. Re: CAM/INLET/CARB RECOMENDATIONS (score: 1): Author: "larry diede" <ldiede@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 06:32:41 PDT; I am using an Isky cam #621626 $84.00 Pacific Automotive Warehouse (PAW) an Offenhuser 360 monifold $220.00 also PAW and intend to use either the Edelbrock AFB 500 CMF or the Carter 400 CMF carbs. S; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-05/msg00037.html (11,338 bytes)
6. Re: CAM/INLET/CARB RECOMENDATIONS (score: 1): Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>; Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 13:30:18 -0500; That's the Dual Port. It's not a dual plane, BTW. The stock Buick/Olds and Edelbrock Performer Rover intakes are dual planes. They have a left/right split plenum with one side of the plenum higher t; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-05/msg00040.html (8,303 bytes)
7. Re: CAM/INLET/CARB RECOMENDATIONS (score: 1): Author: Ian Crocker <ian@btcase.bt.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 10:41:38 +0100 (BST); Of course you're right. My mistake. I'm afraid I don't have any back to back experience on a similar engine. I use a Huffaker now, but the engine has also been opened out to 260ci and runs a differe; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-05/msg00042.html (8,084 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]