Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*300\s+head\s+opinions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*300\s+head\s+opinions\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. 300 head opinions (score: 1): Author: William Elliott <wcelliot@concentric.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 22:24:54 -0600; I'm rebuilding a 1963 high compression 4bbl Buick 215. I have the opportunity to get a set of fresh, ready-to-go Buick 300 heads for $300. I've heard this is a bad idea... and I've heard it's a grea; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-11/msg00003.html (6,749 bytes)
2. Re: 300 head opinions (score: 1): Author: Jim Stuart <jimbb88@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 23:51:06 -0500; The 300 heads will lower your compression to about 8.00 : 1, fine if you are running a supercharger or only have 82 octane gas to burn. They also have a larger combustion chamber diameter than the 21; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-11/msg00004.html (7,360 bytes)
3. RE: 300 head opinions (score: 1): Author: "Jones, Daniel C" <Daniel.Jones@MW.Boeing.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 07:41:39 -0600; It's not worth it on a stock displacement 215. It will kill your compression, more than offsetting the gain from the better flowing ports. On a stroker, things are different. The larger chambers prov; /html/buick-rover-v8/1999-11/msg00005.html (8,817 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]