Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Wedge\]\s+TR7\/8\s+FI\s+air\s+intake\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 04:39:12 EST
This must be new because last year a friend of mine failed the smog inspection because the original air filter box had been replaced by a K&N type filter attached to the air flow meter. I had to help
/html/buick-rover-v8/2006-01/msg00000.html (6,752 bytes)

2. Re: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 01:50:51 EST
You know it could be that the K&N filter is actually legal but the smog test station operators are so paranoid about CARB stings that they reject anything that even looks like a modification. They ha
/html/buick-rover-v8/2006-01/msg00001.html (7,682 bytes)

3. Re: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:38:36 EST
Try some flexible aluminum heat riser hose. It comes in the correct size and is available in any parts store. It's usually painted black so it looks fairly original too. A K&N filter will cause you
/html/buick-rover-v8/2005-12/msg00004.html (7,893 bytes)

4. RE: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Altman" <jaltman@altlaw.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:18:41 -0500
I found some heater air duct hosing at pep boys that was the right size and has served well for about five years. Jim Altman jaltman@altlaw.com --Original Message-- From: owner-tr8@mercury.lcs.mit.ed
/html/buick-rover-v8/2005-12/msg00005.html (8,556 bytes)

5. Re: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: James TenCate <tencate@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 07:13:54 -0700
Quite so. I have a K&N on my TR8 and it DOES offer some initial improvement after the car is first started. You can really feel it. However, Fred is right, as soon as underhood temps grow, the benef
/html/buick-rover-v8/2005-12/msg00006.html (8,365 bytes)

6. Re: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: James TenCate <tencate@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:14:38 -0700
I'm a scientist type (acoustics/geophysics/seismologist) and agree with you about actually *measuring* something. I never believe what I read and often have to try things myself, sometimes discoverin
/html/buick-rover-v8/2005-12/msg00007.html (9,981 bytes)

7. Re: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: James TenCate <tencate@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:40:39 -0700
I bookmarked the site below and it seems relevant to this discussion so thought I'd share it. Probably one of the ones Carl read about in fact. I'll let you all read it and come to your own conclusi
/html/buick-rover-v8/2005-12/msg00008.html (8,229 bytes)

8. Re: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:47:15 EST
Unfortunately, California requires a visual inspection as well as a tailpipe test (and in some areas, a rolling road test). They consider the air cleaner box part of the emissions control system. Unt
/html/buick-rover-v8/2005-12/msg00012.html (8,759 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu