- 1. Re: FW: 14 CUX EFI (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:09:58 +0000
- Hi, Pieter, Sorry to hear about your problems! Hi, Kent, yes, I am on this list! :>) How are you keeping? Pieter, the setup you have is very similar to mine (except I have the serpentine front and or
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2003-02/msg00003.html (9,411 bytes)
- 2. [Fwd: Re: 14 CUX EFI] (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:32:31 +0100
- Sorry, accidentally sent this to Glen instead of the list... Well, thanks, Glen! Not quite Oxford and not quite a professor (which means somewhat higher status over here than there anyway!), also not
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-09/msg00006.html (8,126 bytes)
- 3. [Fwd: Re: 14 CUX EFI] (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:49:39 +0100
- Hmmm - seems I didn't post this to the list, just to Pieter owing to the way the list mailer is set up, so I thought I'd post it now for general interest. Hope it's not considered a waste of bandwidt
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-09/msg00007.html (12,572 bytes)
- 4. Re: 300 hp in a crate? (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:32:06 +0100
- I second that! I too have seen these on a dyno and they do seem to be somewhat enthusiastically rated, especially if you know the limitations of that airflow meter and induction setup. At 5 litres, p
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2001-09/msg00032.html (8,061 bytes)
- 5. Re: 4.2 engine (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:58:27 +0100
- Yes, yes, no and yes. The engine is basically the same, with mounting bolts and bellhousing location the same. The oil pump is accommodated by a different front cover, which can be fitted to an old b
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2001-07/msg00013.html (9,232 bytes)
- 6. Re: 4.2 engine (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:00:36 +0100
- (Meant to send this to the List earlier, but I think Fred got a private copy instead!) I have never seen (in the UK) any variant of this engine except the 3.5 with that bore. The others (3.9, 4.2, 4.
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2001-07/msg00014.html (8,875 bytes)
- 7. Re: 4.2 engine-now4.6 (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:06:03 +0100
- Ah, yes - sometimes I forget how easily I can get parts (or how much junk I have lying around!), and I neglected to note that the cam and timing chain and sprockets are different on a distributorless
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2001-07/msg00027.html (8,776 bytes)
- 8. Re: 4.6 Piston Specs (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 15:55:49 +0000
- There's not much I can disagree with there, Lorne! :>) - except that the piston diameter is definitely 94.00mm, to fit in a bore of 94.04mm. I can add that _at least some_ 4.6 pistons have an offset
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2001-03/msg00013.html (8,356 bytes)
- 9. Re: Lucas ECU 14 Cu (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:16:26 +0000
- Hi, Guys, I hate to keep doing this to you, Lorne, but I think you'll find that the system on TR8s and SD1s was type 4CU, not 14CU! The type 14CU was a forerunner to the 14CUX, being in the same squa
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2001-02/msg00015.html (9,870 bytes)
- 10. Re: Rover blocks (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:51:17 +0100
- I have just checked with some local Rover contacts of mine, and for general information, the difference between 3.9 and 4.0 engines is this: The 'interim' engine is a 3.9 - actually 3947cc, with some
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-08/msg00073.html (9,311 bytes)
- 11. Re: Rocker shaft pillars (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:54:17 +0100
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Hi, Dan, Try D.J. Ellis Ltd. (Nuneaton, UK) Tel: +44 24 7635 2888 Dave has had some pillars made recently (with outriggers) an
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-06/msg00024.html (9,251 bytes)
- 12. Re: Flap type injection & camshafts! (score: 1)
- Author: Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:19:34 +0000
- Hi, Pete, and all others on this fine list, to which I have recently subscribed! Glen Wilson and others may know me from Rovernet. (Hi, Glen!) If you're looking for an excellent road cam, I can recom
- /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-03/msg00037.html (9,090 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu