- 1. Re: vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: Russ Bowlus <rcbowlus@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
- We keep telling people, 'no you can't autocross your Maybe we should take the picture of Rick Brown autocrossing his Jeep off the website? -Russ __________________________________________________ Yah
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00195.html (7,510 bytes)
- 2. Vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@idsfa.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
- I remember a link from the SFR Solo2 home page to this image: http://www.sfrscca.org/solo2/images-autox/jeep.jpg It was used to illustrate that you could race in a parking lot "in your car". Are tru
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00196.html (7,757 bytes)
- 3. Re: Vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: Vernon Head <vhead@fuelrtm.com>
- Date: 16 Oct 2000 10:17:26 -0700
- Trucks are most certainly allowed. And competitive. Check out the Nationals results in FSP. -Vernon
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00197.html (8,040 bytes)
- 4. Re: Vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: "Donald R McKenna" <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:43:49 -0700
- Me thinks that's not, strictly, a "truck", but, Rick Brown"s Jeep Grand Cherokee. An SUV that was lowered (even though it may not be obvious) and had a wider track resulting from after-market wheels
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00200.html (8,543 bytes)
- 5. Re: Vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:39:41 -0700
- Nationals results in FSP. I think what isn't allowed is a vehicle with a high center of gravity or, perhaps more to the point, a high propensity toward rolling over. Not all trucks would fit this cat
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00206.html (8,068 bytes)
- 6. Re: vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: "lllllsharp" <lllllsharp@email.msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:42:08 -0700
- I have been told that the Focus looks like a Mini Mini van !! does that mean I cant run any more? -- Original Message -- From: Russ Bowlus <rcbowlus@yahoo.com> To: <ba-autox@autox.team.net> Sent: Mon
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00208.html (8,148 bytes)
- 7. Re: vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 18:02:20 -0700
- those toyota starlets look like little mini vans too. can we ban them also? -james c mean
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00209.html (8,634 bytes)
- 8. Re: Vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 18:21:47 -0700
- Interestingly, according to that criteria, the AM General Hummer would be an autocrossable vehicle. Despite its amazingly high ground clearance, it's so wide and the suspension is so stiff that it ha
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00211.html (8,563 bytes)
- 9. Re: Vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 18:15:59 -0700
- I think it work best on very heavy duty concrete; probably would tear up --Pat K
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00213.html (8,863 bytes)
- 10. Re: Vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 19:09:52 -0700
- Yeah, stick it in ZZZ Stock. Scot
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00217.html (8,122 bytes)
- 11. Re: vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: Toy4speed@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:30:23 EDT
- on the subject of eligibility... how about a GMC Typhoon ? I'd consider it somewhat of a tall station wagon, with AWD, and a turbo 270 hp motor. Not really for off-roading and the payload rating is m
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00220.html (7,575 bytes)
- 12. Re: vehicle eligibility (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:00:46 EDT
- << Maybe we should take the picture of Rick Brown autocrossing his Jeep off the website? >> Very good point, Russ! CHD
- /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00221.html (7,471 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu