Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vehicle\s+eligibility\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vehicle\s+eligibility\.\.\.\s*$/: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

81. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: David Rowney <daver@uclink4.berkeley.edu>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 08:46:34 -0700; And it gets more complex, because the additional inch of suspension travel, while increasing c. g., reduces the chance of running out of suspension travel, which reduces the chance of roll-over. My V; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00396.html (9,059 bytes)
82. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 12:12:01 EDT; << BTW, Charlie, I agree with you about running out of suspension travel being an important determiner of when a vehicle flips. But it's hard information to use when teching some unfamiliar vehicle a; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00398.html (9,529 bytes)
83. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Bill Hamburgen 650-617-3329 FAX -3374 <billh@pa.dec.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:32:58 -0700; Fair enough, Charlie. You're right about the administrative issues. The buck stops with you. To be a bit more philosophical: Quantitative data without experience can be dangerous or worse. But experi; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00400.html (10,274 bytes)
84. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:03:40 -0700; Slap on a emissions based cam, a *really* inefficient cat, and use a tiny throttle body, throttle body fuel injection so the gasoline gets stuck all over the intake manifold... no problem. :) -kit,; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00401.html (8,358 bytes)
85. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Jason H. Liao" <jhliao@qpt.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:11:45 -0700 (PDT); Kit is on the right track. I did some flipping through the Corvette Black Book since it has power ratings for all the engines by year. The lowest rated 350 was in '75 or so (165 hp), the highest was; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00402.html (8,479 bytes)
86. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:22:01 -0700; If it were 1975 it would probably correlate with crippling the engine to meet the emmissions requirements that were mandated in . . .was it 1973? Something like that, I'm not sure. Have you ever seen; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00405.html (9,176 bytes)
87. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 16:43:46 -0700; The 165hp version has lower compression, milder cam profiles, more restrictive intake/exhaust, perhaps? Not to mention more that I could be missing? Displacement and bore/stroke ratio are not the ent; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00427.html (9,117 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 87
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]