Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vehicle\s+eligibility\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vehicle\s+eligibility\.\.\.\s*$/: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

61. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <navidk@home.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 23:06:41 -0700; If they do move M3s to BSP, I wonder how many are going end up in SM? :) --Navid --Original Message-- From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Jim Ochi S; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00343.html (9,281 bytes)
62. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Au H. Nguyen" <aunguyen@cisco.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:50:40 -0700; Who's your HMO? Au; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00346.html (9,520 bytes)
63. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Bill Hamburgen 650-617-3329 FAX -3374 <billh@pa.dec.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:46:40 -0700; Pacificare was my HMO. But it took some serious pressure to get them to approve a medivac flight to the USA and on to Stanford. They wanted to fly me to an American hospital in Saudi Arabia. My siste; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00347.html (9,884 bytes)
64. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 10:04:20 -0700; James Creasy writes... to a camaro. you know, the old "friends dont let You're right. I'm sorry, Kirk. Your Mustang is just fine. I have no idea what comes over me sometimes. It's been happening more; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00348.html (9,163 bytes)
65. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Kirk Meline <KMeline@iscribe.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:14:08 -0700; Your apology is excepted Katie. Just don't let me stop you or the other M3 drivers from speaking your mind. I know I will be getting the last laugh though. I have plans for the Mustang. But while tha; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00350.html (9,759 bytes)
66. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:11:59 -0700; nice try, but we are not falling for it. there may be a treatment center for this problem. i think the title has the word 'lotus' in it. BTW i posted a 39.0 in my modified mustang yesterday so dont g; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00352.html (9,597 bytes)
67. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:22:51 EDT; mathematical formula can solve any >situation. I'm of the school that believes they solve >very few of our situations in SCCA. Bill replied: << Come on, Charlie. Physics is used to model vehicle dyna; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00354.html (10,284 bytes)
68. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Kirk Meline <KMeline@iscribe.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:31:53 -0700; Modified Mustang? No thats a Mustang on Steroids and Red Bull. Kirk nice try, but we are not falling for it. there may be a treatment center for this problem. i think the title has the word 'lotus'; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00355.html (9,849 bytes)
69. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:38:17 -0700; Kirk Meline writes... Well, he certainly has the attitude to drive a BMW. It might be too much car for him, though. Katie; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00357.html (8,827 bytes)
70. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:16:27 -0700; it Marina Well, jeez, I'm glad you're not borrowing rides in MY class, if this is how you are. ;) Scot - who endured many an @$$-whuppin' in BS last Slush Series at the hands of Ms. K - but I can sti; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00360.html (9,512 bytes)
71. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:20:27 -0700; in Yeah, but your Mustang is modified to the point that it doesn't look anything like Kirk's Mustang. :-b Scot; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00361.html (9,118 bytes)
72. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Kirk Meline <KMeline@iscribe.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:08:21 -0700; Thank you, I guess. You are among other things gracious and gifted. Kirk Kirk Meline writes... Well, he certainly has the attitude to drive a BMW. It might be too much car for him, though. Katie; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00362.html (9,153 bytes)
73. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:34:22 -0700; James, if your car is a "modified mustang" then mine is too. Indeed, it has more Mustang parts than yours does. It makes me feel better to think that neither of them is a modified mustang. -- Michael; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00367.html (9,617 bytes)
74. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:36:13 -0700; Since the 350s that make 165 hp and those that make 330 hp have different stroke to bore ratios and different valvetrains, the reply does not address the question. It's a bit harder to find two engin; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00368.html (9,312 bytes)
75. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 19:07:04 -0700; My car uses the mustang engine, tranny, diff, brakes, electrical system, gauges, and vent controls. I don't have real tires yet because of the 18" wheels. The BFG "G-Force" is the only one in those s; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00375.html (10,016 bytes)
76. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: James Creasy <jcre@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 18:14:41 -0700; the old FFR ads proclaimed that it was the "ultimate bolt-on performance part for your 5 liter mustang". i dunno about the parts count... i even use the mustang gauges and some of the switches. the s; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00376.html (9,221 bytes)
77. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Jason H. Liao" <jhliao@qpt.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 21:05:02 -0700 (PDT); How do you figure? The traditional small block Chevy 350s (ranging from 165-330 hp, according to my 2 minutes of reasearch) all have the same bore/stroke (4.000" bore x 3.48" stroke), and are all pus; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00385.html (8,993 bytes)
78. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Bill Hamburgen <billh@pa.dec.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:26:10 -0700; Seldom being one to shy from a silly argument...or a sharply swerving Choosing displacement to indicate likely horsepower was perhaps a less than ideal example on my part. But using displacement to i; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00387.html (11,244 bytes)
79. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:43:59 -0700; That's news to me. Seems unlikely for two reasons. How does an oversquare engine with 302 ci displacement make only 165 hp? That sounds more like a diesel than a gasoline engine! How did they double; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00390.html (9,246 bytes)
80. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:02:24 EDT; << Since the 350s that make 165 hp and those that make 330 hp have different stroke to bore ratios and different valvetrains, the reply does not address the question. It's a bit harder to find two en; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00392.html (8,817 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]