- 21. Re: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:23:11 -0700
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --628A941AECB4DC97A02CF116 Let's remember the "printed schedule" includes three times: start time at 9 a.m., registration closes at noon; and afternoon (g
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00478.html (11,992 bytes)
- 22. RE: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" <PETER.THANA@Roche.COM>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:41:34 -0700
- Exactly! So, if it is 1:30pm and we are still on the fourth group, then no fun runs until after the event, if any. However, if we finish group 4 at 11am, then we can't start group 5 for two hours any
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00479.html (12,974 bytes)
- 23. RE: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:43:34 -0700
- Thanks! I'm not really sure if the smooth event was because we were just lucky, or the sub 200 turn out, or our constant stressing on keeping things rolling...probably a combination of all the above
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00480.html (11,074 bytes)
- 24. RE: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Gruner <algruner@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
- Given that I have seen two cars on grid this year with missing lug nuts, I think it is a good idea. I liked it. Gave a fun running opportunity to all of us in group one. Too much of a good thing. Su
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00481.html (8,402 bytes)
- 25. RE: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:52:31 -0700
- I place all the praise and blame for the course on Ben & Kristi, they did all the work on that one. Yeah, but then we would have just tossed out the fun runs and still finished on time. It isn't jus
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00482.html (9,021 bytes)
- 26. RE: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:57:04 PDT
- Yeah, yeah, laugh it up - any of y'all would KILL to drop a full second in two fun runs. Nice work, Carl. KeS ________________________________________________________________________
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00483.html (8,311 bytes)
- 27. RE: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:01:03 -0700
- If I had done it in just 1 fun run, maybe I would be on the other side of the 4-runs vs. fun-runs issue ;). As EJ pointed out to me at one point yesterday, the only problem with fun runs is you get
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00484.html (7,895 bytes)
- 28. RE: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" <PETER.THANA@Roche.COM>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:27:25 -0700
- Regarding traffic from Marina, I just figured out one bypass (I'm sure everyone has an even better one). If the one-lane section of 156 is a big mess, you can hang a right on 183 just before it slims
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00485.html (9,414 bytes)
- 29. Re: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:41:24 -0700
- I'm somewhat indifferent to where tech is conducted. On grid works for me mostly because I don't have to search for it. Off grid is good too, if it's marked off well. The 8-cone slalom was a bit much
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00489.html (8,310 bytes)
- 30. Re: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:28:26 EDT
- << Yup, exactly. The question though, is weather people (the morning people especially) would prefer 4 runs for every compeditor, or 3 runs for every compeditor plus some fun runs just for those want
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00495.html (8,519 bytes)
- 31. Re: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: "Donald R McKenna" <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:08:45 -0700
- I think Charlie's three reasons, below, for having only three runs, are right on the mark. I don't recall it's having been mentioned here, on the net, since the Steeering Committee (SC) meeting last
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00498.html (9,995 bytes)
- 32. RE: Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:28:31 -0700
- Don McKenna writes... Three runs, followed by optional fun-runs, appears to be a win-win situaton for everybody, and I applaud the SC for making this decision. Katie K.
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00499.html (7,351 bytes)
- 33. Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: Jesus Villarreal <jesvilla@gte.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 10:30:52 -0700
- Chris, Larry, and a few others, Thanks for your support, I think it's all over. If not then it'll be in private, so as not to waste the time of the good people of this list. Jesus
- /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00232.html (6,260 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu