Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*THANKS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*THANKS\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Thanks (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:23:11 -0700; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --628A941AECB4DC97A02CF116 Let's remember the "printed schedule" includes three times: start time at 9 a.m., registration closes at noon; and afternoon (g; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00478.html (11,992 bytes)
22. RE: Thanks (score: 1): Author: "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" <PETER.THANA@Roche.COM>; Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:41:34 -0700; Exactly! So, if it is 1:30pm and we are still on the fourth group, then no fun runs until after the event, if any. However, if we finish group 4 at 11am, then we can't start group 5 for two hours any; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00479.html (12,974 bytes)
23. RE: Thanks (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:43:34 -0700; Thanks! I'm not really sure if the smooth event was because we were just lucky, or the sub 200 turn out, or our constant stressing on keeping things rolling...probably a combination of all the above; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00480.html (11,074 bytes)
24. RE: Thanks (score: 1): Author: Alan Gruner <algruner@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:51:28 -0700 (PDT); Given that I have seen two cars on grid this year with missing lug nuts, I think it is a good idea. I liked it. Gave a fun running opportunity to all of us in group one. Too much of a good thing. Su; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00481.html (8,402 bytes)
25. RE: Thanks (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:52:31 -0700; I place all the praise and blame for the course on Ben & Kristi, they did all the work on that one. Yeah, but then we would have just tossed out the fun runs and still finished on time. It isn't jus; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00482.html (9,021 bytes)
26. RE: Thanks (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:57:04 PDT; Yeah, yeah, laugh it up - any of y'all would KILL to drop a full second in two fun runs. Nice work, Carl. KeS ________________________________________________________________________; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00483.html (8,311 bytes)
27. RE: Thanks (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:01:03 -0700; If I had done it in just 1 fun run, maybe I would be on the other side of the 4-runs vs. fun-runs issue ;). As EJ pointed out to me at one point yesterday, the only problem with fun runs is you get; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00484.html (7,895 bytes)
28. RE: Thanks (score: 1): Author: "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" <PETER.THANA@Roche.COM>; Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:27:25 -0700; Regarding traffic from Marina, I just figured out one bypass (I'm sure everyone has an even better one). If the one-lane section of 156 is a big mess, you can hang a right on 183 just before it slims; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00485.html (9,414 bytes)
29. Re: Thanks (score: 1): Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:41:24 -0700; I'm somewhat indifferent to where tech is conducted. On grid works for me mostly because I don't have to search for it. Off grid is good too, if it's marked off well. The 8-cone slalom was a bit much; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00489.html (8,310 bytes)
30. Re: Thanks (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:28:26 EDT; << Yup, exactly. The question though, is weather people (the morning people especially) would prefer 4 runs for every compeditor, or 3 runs for every compeditor plus some fun runs just for those want; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00495.html (8,519 bytes)
31. Re: Thanks (score: 1): Author: "Donald R McKenna" <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:08:45 -0700; I think Charlie's three reasons, below, for having only three runs, are right on the mark. I don't recall it's having been mentioned here, on the net, since the Steeering Committee (SC) meeting last; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00498.html (9,995 bytes)
32. RE: Thanks (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:28:31 -0700; Don McKenna writes... Three runs, followed by optional fun-runs, appears to be a win-win situaton for everybody, and I applaud the SC for making this decision. Katie K.; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00499.html (7,351 bytes)
33. Thanks (score: 1): Author: Jesus Villarreal <jesvilla@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 10:30:52 -0700; Chris, Larry, and a few others, Thanks for your support, I think it's all over. If not then it'll be in private, so as not to waste the time of the good people of this list. Jesus; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00232.html (6,260 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 33
Page: [1] [2]