- 41. Re: SFR Calendar for 2001 is posted (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Lahey" <kml@patheticgeek.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:44:29 -0800
- I like running lots and lots of places. Because the SCCA schedule appears to conflict with nearly every NASA event, it sounds like I'm going to have to make a choice. That seems a little silly to me.
- /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00347.html (10,196 bytes)
- 42. Re: SFR Calendar for 2001 is posted (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:09:21 -0800
- I understood John to say that he was taking the sites made available to him. We shouldn't go off thinking that it's a matter of choosing from the many sites available. The reason there were so many o
- /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00348.html (9,226 bytes)
- 43. Re: SFR Calendar for 2001 is posted (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:25:16 EST
- << I certainly don't expect SFR's schedule to change because of MY preferences, either. I *do* think that it should change in responce to the preferences of the members, though. I have a responsibili
- /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00349.html (8,826 bytes)
- 44. Re: SFR Calendar for 2001 is posted (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Lahey" <kml@patheticgeek.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:42:21 -0800
- Ouch. No, I didn't realize that. If I had, I certainly wouldn't have bothered to complain, since the whole point was to try to get some different dates (and possibly different venues). Thanks for the
- /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00350.html (9,246 bytes)
- 45. Re: SFR Calendar for 2001 is posted (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Brown <jerbrown@pacbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:49:35 -0800
- We might all do well to step back a moment and realize that in the Bay Area we have more (and more variety) of motorsport events than just about anywhere... I remember chatting with someone "Back Eas
- /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00351.html (8,757 bytes)
- 46. Re: SFR Calendar for 2001 is posted (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Lahey" <kml@patheticgeek.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 23:16:59 -0800
- I hadn't realized the difficulty of securing sites, but, as several people have pointed out to me in private mail, it ain't easy, and being scheduler isn't much fun. While I had entertained thoughts
- /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00364.html (8,751 bytes)
- 47. Re: SFR Calendar for 2001 is posted (score: 1)
- Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:04:24 -0500
- Message text written by "Kevin Lahey" has us the frankly. Ouch. No, I didn't realize that. If I had, I certainly wouldn't have bothered to complain, since the whole point was to try to get some diffe
- /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00371.html (11,630 bytes)
- 48. RE: SFR Calendar for 2001 is posted (score: 1)
- Author: "Miller, Reginald R." <reginald.miller@unisys.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:19:20 -0600
- Gee John, sounds like the same issues we face up here with Mather and McClellan. I suspect that every person in North America, charged with the responsibility of obtaining sites for autocross, goes t
- /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00372.html (12,276 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu