Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Replying\s+to\s+the\s+list\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Replying\s+to\s+the\s+list\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Replying to the list (score: 1): Author: J C <veloimpreza@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:16:08 -0700 (PDT); Is it possible for the list server to change the default "Reply To:" setting in the mail header to be the list instead of the sender? I think the reason people send to the list and the sender is beca; /html/ba-autox/2002-04/msg00494.html (9,227 bytes)
2. Re: Replying to the list (score: 1): Author: Rex Tener <rex_tener@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:38:53 -0700; They are not lazy, it is the correct netiquette. I am sure that will start a flame war. :-) -- Rex Tener rex_tener@yahoo.com; /html/ba-autox/2002-04/msg00496.html (7,393 bytes)
3. Re: Replying to the list (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:50:09 -0700 (PDT); That doesn't necessarily mean they aren't lazy, though. KeS (If I made reference to insane vampires and sane liars, would anyone know to what I was alluding?); /html/ba-autox/2002-04/msg00497.html (7,816 bytes)
4. Re: Replying to the list (score: 1): Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:56:21 -0700; Um, riiiight, 'cause it's real important to get two copies of every message in any discussion you have participated in. You might delete one by accident, you know? Or you might get fed up with the di; /html/ba-autox/2002-04/msg00498.html (7,966 bytes)
5. Re: Replying to the list (score: 1): Author: Jesus Villarreal <jesvilla@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:06:59 -0700; That would be much like insane autocrossers and sane Hollywood starlets, or that the So.Cal sun is getting to your brain, maybe?? maybe not!! Jesus; /html/ba-autox/2002-04/msg00499.html (7,394 bytes)
6. Re: Replying to the list (score: 1): Author: J C <veloimpreza@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:06:33 -0700 (PDT); Ahhh crap... what have I done? <eek> :-). Okay... perhaps lazy is a bad choice of words as for proper netiquette, huh??? That's the first time in 16 years that I've heard that. If people want a direc; /html/ba-autox/2002-04/msg00512.html (7,679 bytes)
7. Re: Replying to the list (score: 1): Author: J C <veloimpreza@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:20:10 -0700 (PDT); To quote myself: Which brings up another thought, people who do that always get flamed for not reading the list. :-) In conclusion matches and gasoline should not be allowed on the internet. Joe Yaho; /html/ba-autox/2002-04/msg00514.html (7,488 bytes)
8. Re: Replying to the list (score: 1): Author: Jim Ochi <jim_ochi@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:54:55 -0700; Um, not always. Sometimes one or more of the people involved in a "discussion" are in digest mode. CC'ing everyone directly allows the discussion to continue without anyone having to wait until the d; /html/ba-autox/2002-04/msg00515.html (7,373 bytes)
9. Re: Replying to the list (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <kevin_stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:40:19 -0700; You're not supposed to reply to your own messages, either. I'll cc: you on this as well, that'll help the lesson sink in better! KeS; /html/ba-autox/2002-04/msg00519.html (7,952 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]