Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+Class\s+\-\s+ST2\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. New Class - ST2 (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan Nemy" <bnemy@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:07:32 -0800
The SFR Solo 2 Steering Committee approved a new Class last night. The class is called ST2 and will run in the same run group as BS, CS, ES. The rules are defined in this PDF: http://www.4d-sport.com
/html/ba-autox/2004-02/msg00065.html (6,980 bytes)

2. Re: New Class - ST2 (score: 1)
Author: Rex Tener <rex_tener@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:31:47 -0800
Are we going to offer the other new national supplemental class, STU? How about run it with the STS and STX run group? Thanks, -- Rex Tener rex_tener@yahoo.com
/html/ba-autox/2004-02/msg00066.html (7,202 bytes)

3. RE: New Class - ST2 (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan Nemy" <bnemy@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:47:00 -0800
We have not decided on STU. STS and STX are a big run group and some of the cars are coming from CS, ES so we thought that this would not increase the run group size by much. Bryan Are we going to of
/html/ba-autox/2004-02/msg00068.html (7,642 bytes)

4. Re: New Class - ST2 (score: 1)
Author: Phil Esra <pesra@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Hi Bryan and other SC members, I interpret this .pdf as allowing 99+ Miatas and MR2 Spyders, which are specifically excluded from the new national supplemental STS2 class. Am I correct? And will this
/html/ba-autox/2004-02/msg00069.html (7,496 bytes)

5. Re: New Class - ST2 (score: 1)
Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:00:02 -0800
To avoid confusion, I want to let everyone know that there are at least two sets of rules that go by "ST2". The first is the set of rules developed on the Street-touring-2 Yahoo mailing list. These a
/html/ba-autox/2004-02/msg00070.html (8,280 bytes)

6. Re: New Class - ST2 (score: 1)
Author: Rex Tener <rex_tener@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:13:32 -0800
The problem is we have no small run groups! :-) Looking at the first round, only group seven was "small", FS, BSP, BSPV, DSP, ESP, and I think its small size reflects more of its later position in th
/html/ba-autox/2004-02/msg00071.html (7,092 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu